Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
16. Easiest solution would be just to ban their IPs from use of the search engine all together
Thu May 15, 2014, 06:59 AM
May 2014

in those localities.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I didn't understand this case at first. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #1
The monarchies...nt Jesus Malverde May 2014 #2
Or someone who is looking for a job and is pretty sure that her age is working against her. djean111 May 2014 #11
Unless you're telecommuting Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #21
Soooo can the NSA get it's exposure removed? I hope not. L0oniX May 2014 #3
Obama Shown Up billhicks76 May 2014 #10
Delete all. GeorgeGist May 2014 #4
Yep, just eliminate all search engines, let them look their crap up in the phone book / RKP5637 May 2014 #6
Lol. I remember the Internet Yellow Pages Xithras May 2014 #27
Yep, I had one! n/t RKP5637 May 2014 #28
500 million in the article. Thor_MN May 2014 #9
This sounds like a ruling by old people who don't know how to work a computer. /nt Ash_F May 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #19
So, then what about Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo and a zillion search engines. It's not like Google RKP5637 May 2014 #7
Google has 93% of the search market in Europe frazzled May 2014 #8
Absolutely amazing. Frankly, it's quite ignorant. The search engine is only an indexing engine, RKP5637 May 2014 #13
The sources get to keep all the info ... frazzled May 2014 #15
Easiest solution would be just to ban their IPs from use of the search engine all together RKP5637 May 2014 #16
The case was brought by Mario Costeja Gonzalez Nye Bevan May 2014 #12
Thats not the same mario costeja gonzalez Jesus Malverde May 2014 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #20
Yes. He was foreclosed on by the bank, like thousands of Americans have experienced recently... adirondacker May 2014 #23
Good to know... sendero May 2014 #17
From a politician wanting his record in office scrubbed, and a convicted paeodphile muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #18
Exactly. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #22
i have never had a need, a necessity to google any information about any private person Leme May 2014 #24
delete the internet..... penultimate May 2014 #25
Well look from the other side... DontTreadOnMe May 2014 #26
How is this going to work? Google would have to collect as much metadata as possible on the... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #29
That's Google's problem dipsydoodle May 2014 #30
Actually wouldn't it be the people who want to be "forgotten" problem... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #31
Nope dipsydoodle May 2014 #32
And when they can't? That's the issue here, this ruling practically outlaws search engines... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #33
Oh .. Lenomsky May 2014 #34
then shouldn't it be illegal for the newspaper which pulbished the notice to publish such info... JCMach1 May 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Google gets take-down req...»Reply #16