Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
18. Obama completely reversed Bush's decision on the ISS
Thu May 15, 2014, 09:02 PM
May 2014

Bush's decision was to cancel the ISS as soon as our international agreements ended in 2015.
In 2010, Obama extended it to 2020, four months ago he extended it to 2024 and left it open-ended, to 2030 and beyond:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration#Extension_of_ISS_operations

<snip>

Obama also announced an extension of funding for International Space Station operations, 90% complete by mass[15] at the time of the speech but scheduled to be deorbited by as early as 2015 before Obama announced the extension, which will provide funding through 2020.

<snip>


http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html

April 15, 2010

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
ON SPACE EXPLORATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY

John F. Kennedy Space Center

<snip>

So NASA, from the start, several months ago when I issued my budget, was one of the areas where we didn’t just maintain a freeze but we actually increased funding by $6 billion.

<snip>

And we will extend the life of the International Space Station likely by more than five years, while actually using it for its intended purpose: conducting advanced research that can help improve the daily lives of people here on Earth, as well as testing and improving upon our capabilities in space. This includes technologies like more efficient life support systems that will help reduce the cost of future missions. And in order to reach the space station, we will work with a growing array of private companies competing to make getting to space easier and more affordable. (Applause.)

<snip>


http://www.universetoday.com/107905/nasa-international-space-station-operations-extended-to-2024/

NASA: International Space Station Operations Extended to 2024
by Nancy Atkinson on January 8, 2014

NASA announced today that the Obama administration has approved NASA’s request for an extension of operations for the International Space Station for an additional four years to 2024. This means work on board the orbiting laboratory will continue at least for another decade.

<snip>

Gerstenmaier also sees the ISS as a proving ground for future human spaceflight plans to head out to deep space. “NASA doesn’t think of ISS and deep space human plans as separate, but as a combined strategy,” he said.

A recent review of ISS modules and equipment ensured that the station could likely last until 2028, and Gerstenmaier said this new extension allows operations to be at least considered until nearly 2030.

“Ten years from today is a far-reaching vision,” he said. “Our international partners are well aware of this extension and they were involved in hardware studies to see if station operations could extend. They will continue to evaluate their hardware and they all see this as a positive step in moving forward. … This is truly an international endeavor and we all work together.”

<snip>


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Other partners being China and India dipsydoodle May 2014 #1
Europe is already partnering with China for manned space flight. bananas May 2014 #7
I wonder whose boned idea was it to retire the space shuttle fleet and rely on Russia exclusively? 951-Riverside May 2014 #2
On paper, it was the Obama administration's idea DavidDvorkin May 2014 #3
No, it was Bush's idea. bananas May 2014 #5
John Glenn said it was Obama. former9thward May 2014 #8
No, Glenn didn't say it was Obama - Obama actually extended the Shuttle and ISS life. bananas May 2014 #10
Obama kept it going for a year or so. former9thward May 2014 #13
Obama completely reversed Bush's decision on the ISS bananas May 2014 #18
Well that extension went out the window today. former9thward May 2014 #19
Do you acknowledge that Bush cancelled the Space Shuttle? bananas May 2014 #20
Yes I do. former9thward May 2014 #26
Yes, but Congress underfunds NASA. bananas May 2014 #30
"Republicans don't like the President. They have stated very clearly that will oppose anything..." bananas May 2014 #32
Bush, Jan 2004: "In 2010, the Space Shuttle - after nearly 30 years of duty - will be retired" bananas May 2014 #11
Glenn: "I disagreed strongly, and still do, with George Bush's decision to (retire the shuttle)" bananas May 2014 #21
John Glenn, 2012: "The unfortunate decision eight and a half years ago to terminate the shuttle" bananas May 2014 #22
The unfortunate decision that was not reversed in 2009. former9thward May 2014 #27
Jan 14, 2004 skydive forever May 2014 #17
Wow, about 3 times the NASA budget salib May 2014 #4
I hope we get a spending war on space! nt bananas May 2014 #6
It won't happen.... unless there's money in it for the 1%. go west young man May 2014 #12
If either the Russians or Chinese decide to go to the moon Gore1FL May 2014 #15
That I could agree with.....love it when we invest in space exploration... go west young man May 2014 #16
"Through 2020." Basically that's $8 billion a year. joshcryer May 2014 #23
Coincidentally Bosonic May 2014 #9
keeps three people in space 24/7 quadrature May 2014 #14
First, I find it utterly disgusting that some DUers repeat RW talking points davidpdx May 2014 #24
Another "Space Race" Nitram May 2014 #25
Honestly vdogg May 2014 #28
I could support a space race, as opposed to to an arms race. Adrahil May 2014 #29
Been there, would love to do it again. DavidDvorkin May 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian Space Program Get...»Reply #18