Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
24. See post 23.
Wed May 21, 2014, 12:21 PM
May 2014

Also, from the same site, for a billet in Norway:

Passports

Although the service member technically does not need to have a passport to arrive here, they will need one to obtain a Norwegian bank account as well as to go on leave and return. They should buy a tourist passport. If you are going to be assigned to a NATO billet, please contact your sponsor as you may be required to obtain an official passport in support of your official duties. Family members should obtain tourist passports for personal travel in addition to their “Official No-Fee Passport”.


This requirement was always written into my orders.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They probably looking at it in an event where they are struggling getting recruits itsrobert May 2014 #1
Only one-in-four Americans fit to serve in the military Jesus Malverde May 2014 #3
Yeah, but when they need recruits itsrobert May 2014 #6
The comments on that RT story are so nice.... penultimate May 2014 #18
How would that affect deployment, I wonder? MADem May 2014 #2
Most deployments don't require a passport Recursion May 2014 #4
I've been in ten or fifteen countries on military orders and I always needed a passport. MADem May 2014 #9
I was invading every country I entered on military orders Recursion May 2014 #11
Yes, I was, and I always had to cough up a passport. Never was able to travel without one. nt MADem May 2014 #21
When was this? AnalystInParadise May 2014 #22
Right up to Nine Wun Wun. MADem May 2014 #23
I believe you, but that is so strange AnalystInParadise May 2014 #25
I've had UN and NATO postings and often been required to travel. MADem May 2014 #27
Recently retired military here AnalystInParadise May 2014 #13
See post 23. MADem May 2014 #24
It's cool man. I totally believe you AnalystInParadise May 2014 #28
I wish I was 40 again! MADem May 2014 #29
All people caught entering illegally should have an option to serve a min of 4 years... 951-Riverside May 2014 #5
The Roman Imperial Army policy.... happyslug May 2014 #17
This would set a horrible precedent. Just say NO to indentured soldiers! reformist2 May 2014 #7
The military doesn't want indentured servants. It's competitive. Three out of four applicants are MADem May 2014 #10
Side note: I think the Pentagon loosened the tat requirements recently Recursion May 2014 #12
Actually they just tightened up the tattoo requirements for the Army AnalystInParadise May 2014 #14
Thanks; I just checked and that was in fact the Commandant only Recursion May 2014 #15
Army is tightening up in a big way. Placement and size are disqualifiers. MADem May 2014 #20
There is probably a need for foreign language speakers and that may be one reason they're okaawhatever May 2014 #16
That might be a possibility, particularly with people who speak MADem May 2014 #19
This is what happens when there aren't enough wars and killing boogie men going on. L0oniX May 2014 #8
oh, I don't think you will have to worry about that. olddad56 May 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pentagon eyeing immigrant...»Reply #24