Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
9. Sibel Edmonds: "Checkbook Journalism & Leaking to the Highest Bidders"
Wed May 21, 2014, 04:16 PM
May 2014
That’s right. A whistleblower breaks the law to obtain 50,000 documents, he flees the country to escape prosecution and jail time, he hands over these 50,000 pages to a handful of individuals in return for their promise to present these documents to the public, six months pass, and the public gets 1% of these documents. But please, wait. This is not all. Far more interesting and troubling things happen meanwhile.

The main wanna-be reporter begins his relentless pursuit of high dollars in return for … for what? In return for exclusive interviews where he would discuss some of this material. In return for a very lucrative book deal where he would expose a few extra pages of these 50,000-page documents. In return for a partnership with and extremely high salary from a Mega Corporation (think 1%) where he would … hmmmm, well, it is not very clear: maybe in return for sitting on and never releasing some of these documents, or, releasing a few select pages?

That’s right. The culprit is able to use his role in the whistleblower case, and his de facto ownership of the whistleblower’s 50,000-page evidence, to gain huge sums of money, fame, a mega corporate position, book and movie deals … yet, making sure that the public would never see more than a few percent of the incriminating evidence.

Of course, secondhand checkbook profiteers tend to be very savvy, able to blow smoke, muddy water, and obscure their real deeds and true personhoods. This particular one is famous for spending years as an ambulance-chasing style attorney, where all he had to do was to write dozens of pages to make cases that were never cases, or make real cases appear as if they never were.


See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/12/08/checkbook-journalism-leaking-to-the-highest-bidders/#sthash.esuPxh6S.dpuf

You're spot on Soap. Even Anonymous was discussing showing up at GG's events to protest his greed. This has never been about the public good for these guys.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

...they're all nuts. SoapBox May 2014 #1
I agree. appacom May 2014 #2
Well, then it's settled then. Hissyspit May 2014 #3
You made me laugh out loud at myself. Thanks appacom May 2014 #25
Judge Someone Else billhicks76 May 2014 #4
+1 n/t dotymed May 2014 #5
You "judge someone else".. her description is dead on. Cha May 2014 #14
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #23
You "stop pretending to be a liberal". Cha May 2014 #24
+1 n/t MBS May 2014 #7
Sibel Edmonds: "Checkbook Journalism & Leaking to the Highest Bidders" Tarheel_Dem May 2014 #9
ICYMI.. Cha May 2014 #13
Which is why real "whistleblowers" are pissed. We're repeatedly told to take GG out of the equation. Tarheel_Dem May 2014 #15
Whistleblowers should be pissed.. snowden isn't one of them.. Now his agent has to deal Cha May 2014 #16
Like I said, this ought to be good. I've even wondered if it was Anonymous who attacked ebay? Tarheel_Dem May 2014 #18
From the start this story has been nothing but a game for those two Blue_Tires May 2014 #6
Ooooh, sounds like somebody's jealous. Two Narcissists going at it. This ought to be good. Tarheel_Dem May 2014 #8
No charges against Assange right now. I'd anticipate that changing to reckless endangerment for 24601 May 2014 #10
no,only Snowden would be charged in relation to the documents JI7 May 2014 #11
Releasing a document is "premeditated murder"? The Stranger May 2014 #12
When he does it after first admitting it will put people in danger, absolutely yes. Look at this 24601 May 2014 #17
No, that's not even close. The Stranger May 2014 #19
It's Afghanistan. JackRiddler May 2014 #20
You called it. Hissyspit May 2014 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author JackRiddler May 2014 #21
I'd guess Pakistan or Russia... EX500rider May 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Assange Threatens to Rele...»Reply #9