Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(33,353 posts)
8. Post kept by a jury, 3-4
Fri May 23, 2014, 02:24 PM
May 2014
JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri May 23, 2014, 11:16 AM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I happen to agree with the post being alerted on.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a point of view that disagrees with another point of view. Not enough to hide in my opinion.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Even if that wasn't intentional.....yes, I will have to side with the alerter.....it *does* come off that way.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I just think of how many people in the military had no other career choices.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a discussion board. I don't see this breaking any rules. Argue with the poster instead of alerting.

Thank you.


Posts 2 and 7 are so freaking annoying with their "anything goes" tone. People have to realize that some opinions are simply off limits.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Omar Khadr faces $50M sui...»Reply #8