Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: California gunman 'was filmmaker Peter Rodger's son' [View all]ManiacJoe
(10,138 posts)47. You don't need three for that, just one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Any 22 year old allowed 3 guns legally is living in a horribly gone wrong country.
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#15
Agreed. This thread was going in a sane direction till the NRA apologists erupted
FailureToCommunicate
May 2014
#23
Give us a good reason -- heck, give us a bad reason -- for a random 22-year-old to need 3 handguns
Fortinbras Armstrong
May 2014
#32
There is no good reason. But for that matter there is no good reason why any
totodeinhere
May 2014
#41
Why does anyone in the US "need" to make a speech, peacefully assemble, worship as they see fit?
24601
May 2014
#49
I didn't make it clear. I was agreeing with the poster, and adding a reaction to these recent
FailureToCommunicate
May 2014
#40
And btw, contrary to media reports, an "Assistant Director" is not a "Director"
Schema Thing
May 2014
#2
Could be. It's senseless to try and guess very much from very little information.
Schema Thing
May 2014
#12
The Media does not care for facts, sir, they are head hunters and headline hunters only.
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#16
Yes. They are more likely to move into producing or procuction managing than directing.
cui bono
May 2014
#26
Is it common for their income to include a percentage of the film's profits above salary?
Lodestar
May 2014
#34
hmmm, I'd say 50/50, but they often boss the actual Director around, lol -
Schema Thing
May 2014
#44
I'd guess bad editing before leaping to conclusions. Probably was "their" child instead of "the"
riderinthestorm
May 2014
#11
Doesn't it get old to blame Reagan for events 25 years after he left power?
former9thward
May 2014
#53