Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Sanford's City Manager posts open letter on municipal website: [View all]MD20
(123 posts)41. Your excerpt is NOT from the US Constitution.
Although you cite with certainty and conviction, annexing the wording in your excerpt to the US Constitution is somewhat problematic. I don't think you meant to make the addition but I feel duty bound to point it out
Further, "probable cause protection" emanates from the 4th Amendment of the USC, not the 5th or the 14th Amendments
Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Your excerpt comes from Florida Statutes- XLVI Crimes Section. But the reference cited is only a general precursor to the specifics of the law. Here is the link for an in depth analysis of the use of deadly force as it applies to Floridians and anyone visiting Florida!
http://law.onecle.com/florida/crimes/776.013.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sounds like a level-headed and objective, yet cautious manager, who also understands
Thegonagle
Mar 2012
#3
"Trial by media" is the only reason that the investigation is ongoing. The police were closing it.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#16
What an awful thing to say. As a mother, I would be a "basket case" too if I'd witnessed that.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#17
The letter is coherent and informative. It provides potentially credible explanations for a lot.
slackmaster
Mar 2012
#15
Note that the city manager says that the "stand your ground" law prohibited them from arrest.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#18
My point is that the city manager and the police chief have both cited that law as the reason.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#20
"So please stuff your invented ad hominem back into the sphincter you pulled it from.
amuse bouche
Mar 2012
#50
Actually, the cops are *always* prohibited from arresting you without probable cause.
X_Digger
Mar 2012
#36
It's hard to believe that standing over a dead body with a smoking gun is not probable cause.
Kablooie
Mar 2012
#38
In certain communities you'd be surprised at how much the cops can stretch "probable cause"
Blue_Tires
Mar 2012
#42