Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

randys1

(16,286 posts)
32. Women who will resort to unsafe abortions or drugs and possibly die
Thu May 29, 2014, 04:26 PM
May 2014

that isnt an attack?

Now I may stop posting on guns and bibles, cuz it aint worth it anymore, but this one I cant back down from

that is bullshit

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

much like what texas did to abortion clinics leftyohiolib May 2014 #1
Beat me to it! 7962 May 2014 #7
Isn't it amusing just how similar the tactics used are to each other? NutmegYankee May 2014 #14
What was done in Texas is a violent attack on Women randys1 May 2014 #26
gun people say it's an attack on them no one in either case was attacked any attempt t say so leftyohiolib May 2014 #31
Women who will resort to unsafe abortions or drugs and possibly die randys1 May 2014 #32
women who do that attack themselves now im not infavor of the fetal death penalty but women need leftyohiolib May 2014 #38
WTF , women attack themselves how ?? Oh wait, I see you are anti woman health rights randys1 May 2014 #39
nope youre wrong. they do it to themselves b/c they "will resort to unsafe abortions or drugs " like leftyohiolib May 2014 #41
sigh randys1 May 2014 #42
if it makes you feel better i also think it's none of my business so i dont let it influence my vote leftyohiolib May 2014 #45
Another waste of tax money. former9thward May 2014 #2
What about the ordinance is unconstitutional? wtmusic May 2014 #4
No I read the summary at the link. former9thward May 2014 #5
Gun stores will be allowed to sell guns, but they will be "well regulated". wtmusic May 2014 #10
Sorry you need a history lesson. former9thward May 2014 #12
It seems like a perfectly reasonable law Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #15
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #16
So let's make buying guns easier Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #17
Where did you serve in the Nam warrant46 May 2014 #18
I was with 1/502 173d Airborne Bde Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #24
Way too many alcoholics in Chicago. former9thward May 2014 #19
Bars do not have a primary use of killing people Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #25
They directly lead to drunken car killings. former9thward May 2014 #28
To repeat the point that you are so assiduously dodging Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #33
Fine, finally got the truth out of you. former9thward May 2014 #36
Yes, I do Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #47
Nonsense. Were you FOX-schooled? wtmusic May 2014 #20
It was James Madison who defined them. former9thward May 2014 #21
Not uncomfortable at all. wtmusic May 2014 #22
Name a Supreme Court Justice who agrees with your distorted view. former9thward May 2014 #23
Of course, the "militia" referred to in the Second Amendment no longer exists Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #29
The false consensus effect is strong in you, isn't it? friendly_iconoclast May 2014 #34
The word 'regulations' appears many times in the Constitution NoGOPZone May 2014 #52
Both liberal and conservative legal scholars have researched this. former9thward May 2014 #53
you haven't even come close to answering MY questions. NoGOPZone May 2014 #54
Neither one of us is going to answer questions. former9thward May 2014 #55
you can take that up with those posters NoGOPZone May 2014 #56
No constiturional right to sell booze AngryAmish May 2014 #51
De facto bans are just as illegal as overt bans... Ballast_Point May 2014 #48
I wonder if at some point the state will pass state-preemption of local firearm laws AtheistCrusader May 2014 #3
The concealed carry law, passed last year by the state, pre-empts any new handgun laws DonP May 2014 #30
Is Toni Preckwinkle running for mayor? trublu992 May 2014 #6
We have a constitutional right to guns. We do not have a constitutional right to gun stores... DRoseDARs May 2014 #8
You can NOT ban the sale of something that is legal to own happyslug May 2014 #9
The federal judge disagrees with you. former9thward May 2014 #13
Nothing on the actual Ordinance , yet happyslug May 2014 #11
while righty works overtime attacking women and wanting to maintain everybodys right to shoot randys1 May 2014 #27
Do you have anything useful you wished to add to the conversation? friendly_iconoclast May 2014 #35
DC's strict/draconian (depending on your POV) registration law just survived SCOTUS Recursion May 2014 #37
Rahmbo did something right? KamaAina May 2014 #40
I know Rahm is not popular here, but I'm surprised by the negative reactions. Nye Bevan May 2014 #43
To answer your question: billh58 May 2014 #44
Thats so false its funny. beevul May 2014 #46
Now THAT is "an inconvenient truth" derby378 May 2014 #50
It is the underhand method he is employing to ensure there are no gun stores in Chicago hack89 May 2014 #49
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chicago mayor offers gun ...»Reply #32