Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Politicub

(12,165 posts)

38. Great post!

Reply to Corey_Baker08 (Reply #36)

Sat May 31, 2014, 04:57 PM

May 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama: Clinton would be a very effective president [View all] DonViejo May 2014 OP

This should get interesting treestar May 2014 #1

Hmm.. plan all along? Dawgs May 2014 #2

The question would be effective for whom ... TBF May 2014 #3

Hillary is a warmonger lululu May 2014 #4

I think it's really hard to judge how she'd TBF May 2014 #5

That's a good assessment and I agree davidpdx May 2014 #16

If she did it'd be a bigger upset than Gore choosing not to run again. joshcryer May 2014 #22

Nonsense!!! Beacool May 2014 #11

She wanted single payer and was against intervening in Bosnia. joshcryer May 2014 #21

I Completely Disagree With That Sentiment & I Believe She Does Deserve Credit Corey_Baker08 May 2014 #36

Great post! Politicub May 2014 #38

I wonder which would be better at fighting the established republican machinery to get RKP5637 May 2014 #26

Good question - TBF May 2014 #28

I think she might be better at fighting in the trenches, so many republicans are extremely RKP5637 May 2014 #30

It is sad - TBF May 2014 #32

Yep, same here. I tend to be idealistic, but I do know one has to be pragmatic to RKP5637 May 2014 #33

I think Hillary would be great. hamsterjill May 2014 #6

The thing with Elizabeth (whom I love) TBF May 2014 #17

You're absolutely right. hamsterjill May 2014 #18

I think the thing is, who would pull in $2 billion without batting an eye? joshcryer May 2014 #23

that is why the veep is important DonCoquixote May 2014 #24

I actually think it will be Castro TBF May 2014 #25

My thoughts are the same as yours. I like both, but I do think Hillary would have a better chance of RKP5637 May 2014 #31

I'm afraid she'd be more "effective" than he has in all the *wrong* ways HomerRamone May 2014 #7

DJIA over 32,000? Octafish May 2014 #8

So, it has been decided huh? /nt Ash_F May 2014 #9

Not by me. I will not vote for her. LoisB May 2014 #10

This will chap some backsides over here. Beacool May 2014 #12

Effective =/= good. JoeyT May 2014 #13

<<Another>> reason NOT to vote for HRC! NO MORE Third Way, wanna-be GOP, Corporate ConservaDems! blkmusclmachine May 2014 #14

No argument here. KamaAina May 2014 #15

Here's the full interview struggle4progress May 2014 #19

nice interview steve2470 May 2014 #34

How surprising, that the corporate president endorses the corporate candidate. woo me with science May 2014 #20

And this is news, or a surprise? Bwahahaha! djean111 May 2014 #27

Big K&R! Clinton will be an amazing president! MannyGoldstein May 2014 #29

So, the President's right there with Elizabeth Warren... brooklynite May 2014 #35

Hillary is Qualified To Be President & This Is Why Corey_Baker08 May 2014 #37

This........... Beacool May 2014 #39

Thank-You Corey_Baker08 Jun 2014 #40

And why she's not qualified. Octafish Jun 2014 #41

Effective for who? Myrina Jun 2014 #42