Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
20. I know for a FACT that wealthy ambassadors supplement the entertainment funds.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 12:47 PM
Jun 2014

They'll also shell out to refurbish their quarters.

http://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/politics/plum-posts


In 1993, Pamela Digby Churchill Hayward Harriman shipped her renowned art collection, including Van Gogh’s White Roses (which she had received from her last husband, Averell Harriman), to the American ambassador’s residence, on Rue du Faubourg St.-Honoré in Paris. Days later the English-born socialite, famed for her meticulous elegance and her unparalleled ability to charm powerful men, arrived to take her position as the ambassador to France, appointed by President Clinton. Except perhaps among the Democratic Party insiders for whom she had raised millions and plotted campaign strategy, Harriman, who always kept the embassy awash in fresh orchids, was known more for her hosting abilities than for her deftness in trade talk and diplomacy.

In the aftermath of the killing of Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Ben­ghazi, Libya, last September, it’s clearer than ever that the title "ambassador" connotes two very distinct jobs, with two wholly different candidate pools. When it comes to posts in Central America, Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, or Haiti, deep ­pockets and chumminess with the commander-in-chief are incidental, at most, and usually irrelevant. (China and Mexico can fall into that category too, depending on the political climate.) Career diplomats are sent to those places, and they receive hardship allowances and danger pay to live in often perilous conditions and keep tabs on impending political uprisings, human rights abuses, and potential threats to America and its interests. Then there are the jobs in Western Europe — particularly France, Italy, and the United Kingdom — and other always friendly places such as New Zealand, Japan, and many Caribbean countries, where maintaining the status quo, through attending social functions and cultural events, is the bulk of the job description. These ambassadorships are hung like bait for wealthy and influential friends of would-be presidents.

"Cash for cachet” has been going on since this nation's early days, when the Founding Fathers appointed well-heeled friends to overseas posts. Since then influential nondiplomats have regularly been rewarded with the best embassy jobs. FDR made Joseph P. Kennedy Sr. ambassador to the U.K.; former child movie star Shirley Temple Black served in two ambassador posts under two different presidents; playwright, congresswoman, and socialite Clare Boothe Luce (wife of publisher Henry Luce) was ambassador to Italy under Eisenhower; and actor John Gavin served as ambassador to Mexico under Ronald Reagan. But more than fame, it’s campaign donations that can seal an appointment. In 1971, President Richard Nixon told White House chief of staff H.R. Haldeman, “Anybody who wants to be an ambassador must at least give $250,000.” Haldeman agreed, according to released recordings, stating, “I think any contributor under $100,000 we shouldn’t consider for any kind of thing."

In the wake of Watergate, President Jimmy Carter signed the 1980 Foreign Service Act into law, which states that an appointed or assigned chief of mission should know a country’s language and have a deep “knowledge and understanding of the history, the culture, the economic and political institutions, and the interests of that country and its people.” The act also says, “Contributions to political campaigns should not be a factor ..... It’s a piece of legislation that no president since has had any qualms about ignoring. In part this is because wealth is an essential requirement for being an ambassador, at least in such high-profile posts as London and Paris. Campaign donations aren’t the end of the spending spree; they’re just the beginning. Not only do ambassadors abandon their private sector professions to serve, they inevitably use personal accounts for entertaining, decorating, and dressing like a diplomat, because Congress appropriates enough funds for embassies to operate, period — not operate stylishly. Pamela Harriman reportedly spent between $120,000 and $180,000 a year entertaining in Paris on behalf of her country.....

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If I were French, I'd be insulted Demeter Jun 2014 #1
You're not serious, are you? MADem Jun 2014 #16
Shirley Temple Actually did work and was qualified (go figure...Ronnie screwed up) Demeter Jun 2014 #17
Shirley was a conservative Republican and a Big Money Donor. MADem Jun 2014 #33
"they sent Caroline to Japan hoping she'd get radiation poisoning." TeamPooka Jun 2014 #43
"Joseph P. Kennedy and the Creation of the SEC (1934-35)" ucrdem Jun 2014 #24
"Set a thief to catch a thief." FDR. MADem Jun 2014 #37
Reagan made John Gavin the Ambassador to Mexico. displacedtexan Jun 2014 #32
It always been part heaven05 Jun 2014 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #6
yeah, yeah heaven05 Jun 2014 #10
So what? IDemo Jun 2014 #8
when it changes as you would wish heaven05 Jun 2014 #9
Not just money; fame AND connections. Don't you think it makes sense for a President to MADem Jun 2014 #19
from wikipedia Demeter Jun 2014 #22
Yes, it does, actually! She was at a party with Henry Kissinger--that's how everyone gets jobs? MADem Jun 2014 #40
I found this.. Cha Jun 2014 #52
If she knows her Le Pens from her Sarkosys from her Hollandes, she's doing better than MADem Jun 2014 #54
Precisely! Oh but, "she raised money for Cha Jun 2014 #58
Funny how it has been OK for every President in the modern 20th Century to put fundraisers in MADem Jun 2014 #59
any excuse to knee jerk. Cha Jun 2014 #60
I'm shocked, shocked frazzled Jun 2014 #3
And what has happened to the strength of our institutions during that period? newthinking Jun 2014 #7
You think this hasn't ALWAYS been the case? NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #18
Pretty much so. Will the French go on strike and start rioting over this? freshwest Jun 2014 #47
meritocracy theaocp Jun 2014 #4
Paris is a plum assignment. Beacool Jun 2014 #5
Joe had already been inaugural chair of the SEC (1932-35) ucrdem Jun 2014 #11
Well, he did score points for having as his mistress the top actress of her time. Beacool Jun 2014 #23
The guy she murders in Sunset Blvd is named Joe. ucrdem Jun 2014 #29
You know what? Beacool Jun 2014 #30
He even had her on the boat with his wife and kids, the basstid! No shame, really! MADem Jun 2014 #41
Turns out she's worked in other Dem administrations: ucrdem Jun 2014 #12
Not that it matters but the U.S. does pay all entertainment expenses. former9thward Jun 2014 #14
Some expenses. But this is Paris. ucrdem Jun 2014 #15
See the link at post 20--there's a reason why rich people are given these jobs; poor folk MADem Jun 2014 #21
See #24 for a note on Joe Kennedy, founding chair of the SEC. ucrdem Jun 2014 #25
And THAT was a "Fox Watching the Henhouse" appointment, too. MADem Jun 2014 #27
Apparently it's more fun to be outraged... greatauntoftriplets Jun 2014 #28
Precisely. MADem Jun 2014 #31
They have to know how to entertain without apparent effort and in a grand style. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2014 #38
I know for a FACT that wealthy ambassadors supplement the entertainment funds. MADem Jun 2014 #20
As someone directly affected by this kind of appointment, I'm pissed DFW Jun 2014 #13
I'm not pissed--I think it's a good deal all around. MADem Jun 2014 #26
That's NOT the way it worked with my friend, but he was the exception, not the rule DFW Jun 2014 #35
I wouldn't let it trouble me. If the Number Two was an idiot as well, I'd be concerned. MADem Jun 2014 #42
Far be it from me to disagree with you or DFW, but that pic is LOL! freshwest Jun 2014 #45
It's the perfect one to be snarky about him, without being "OTT"--you could always MADem Jun 2014 #49
Yup! But if confronted with orders from the reichwing, I'd use the other. They'd never catch on! freshwest Jun 2014 #50
I recognize and support you as one of the adults in the room, DFW Demeter Jun 2014 #34
It is still a rather diverse group, it seems to me DFW Jun 2014 #36
Is this person unqualified, in your opinion? CTyankee Jun 2014 #53
This is such a NON-STORY. I don't even know why it was posted at DU. Discussionist might be better. dballance Jun 2014 #39
As someone else pointed out the NONSTORY ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #46
Why is this reported as if it is unusual? Every president does this. 6000eliot Jun 2014 #44
It may, as Rick Santorum said, have something to do with the ...uhhh.. unnnnh ... blaaaaaaa.....!!!! MADem Jun 2014 #55
+1000! 6000eliot Jun 2014 #57
according to some republican I was arguing with on quora, redruddyred Jun 2014 #48
Does she speak French...??? Historic NY Jun 2014 #51
Yes, she does. nt MADem Jun 2014 #56
What would Don Siegelman think? Octafish Jun 2014 #61
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama nominates fundraise...»Reply #20