Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: California teacher tenure law unconstitutional [View all]Mona
(135 posts)27. Aljazeera got it right in their article.....
There may be a problem with allowing bad teachers to continue teacher, and being reassigned to districts that have less political clout, but the answer is not to do away with tenure, which is important to those in the profession...
"One year of teaching experience is the new normal in Americas classrooms. Nationwide, schools are embracing tenderfoot teachers instead of skilled, veteran educators what the industry calls master teachers, an informal moniker that denotes expertise in content creation, differentiated instruction and student outcomes in the face of education reform.
According to multiple peer-reviewed studies, the professional longevity of a master teacher someone who has eight or more consecutive years in the classroom leads to increased student engagement and academic success. These hallmarks of an exceptional education have become less than visible in the United States school system, which has not been deemed exceptional or even satisfactory for quite some time, according to international rankings by the Programme for International Student Assessment. Mediocrity in American education will persist as long as we have a disproportionate number of green teachers. Whats worse is that this mediocrity is easily avoidable and fully intentional.
Several reasons exist for this neophytism, but first among them is the decline of tenure.....
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/6/education-teachercharterschoolstenure.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not only are they anti-union they wish the complete privitization of public schools nt.
liskddksil
Jun 2014
#24
The eight schoolchildren listed? The ones who testified at trial? Kindly tell me which named
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#25
All the Rhee, Gates, Broad, Silicon Valley, Hedgefund Money that are Financing Students Matter
liskddksil
Jun 2014
#30
Yeah those 8 students pooled all their money together and got some lawyers to represent them.
neverforget
Jun 2014
#60
You know, when Justice Marshall and the NAACP put together the Brown Plaintiffs, they
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#67
If you can't recognize obvious window-dressing then go ahead and continue to be deceived
nikto
Jun 2014
#92
Indeed...I remember the critiques of Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP when the
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#95
dont they have to prove that these teachers are bad in order to say that they
leftyohiolib
Jun 2014
#8
It took LAUSD 3.5 million and 5 years just to fire 7 incompetent teachers....
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#16
That is a statement made on page 15 of the Complaint, and then NOT supported by any evidence
happyslug
Jun 2014
#84
The rubber rooms were closed about 5 years ago. It was easily done. It turns out that
Squinch
Jun 2014
#34
What this article is saying is that it is taking from June to August to fire a teacher. 2 months.
Squinch
Jun 2014
#35
The average in the private sector companies I worked in were three documented incidents,
Squinch
Jun 2014
#82
Perhaps some of the kids drove her to drink. This could be a workplace disabilities case. Is there
24601
Jun 2014
#100
The suit didn't address that. Frankly, I think they would be too disparate in situation. K-12
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#22
Brown V Board. They convinced the court that K-12 tenure was causing racial discrimination.
Xithras
Jun 2014
#33
Are you referring to the California Judge (not a justice) that made this ruling? The State of
24601
Jun 2014
#43
If feel very uneasy about this, even after reading the posts here. I still don't see how tenure is
freshwest
Jun 2014
#91
Ted Olsen was also an attorney for the Plaintiffs. Although he was on the wrong side of Bush v.
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#21
Yes...of course an attorney who worked for the Obama campaign, has written about it extensively on
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#68
Well that attorney couldn't possibly be wrong because he worked for OBAMA! That makes
neverforget
Jun 2014
#86
Regardless, that attorney couldn't possibly be wrong because she worked for OBAMA! That makes
neverforget
Jun 2014
#93
A science teacher in Mississsippi teaching evolution needs academic freedom
bluestateguy
Jun 2014
#48
Or, in my junior high for instance, a science teacher saying the sun went around the earth
Recursion
Jun 2014
#53