All this uproar over a prisoner swap, makes me wonder what is going on behind the scenes that we are being distracted from, but aside from that, I can't help but wonder what is so bad about bringing Sgt. Bergdahl home? Hasn't that always been America's policy of never leaving a man behind?
Some people are saying we traded five of the 'worst of the worst' terrorists, for a traitor or deserter, whatever.
People like Senator John McCain, saying it was a terrible move on Obama's part because these five men will just turn around and attack us again, and I say really?
After 12 long years in the Gitmo torture camp. these five men are going to pick up where they left off? Instead of going home to their families to try to resume some kind of a life for themselves, after 12 years away they are basically strangers to the people they once knew, and whatever organizations they might have belonged to, they are also strangers.
I doubt if their reception is any better where they are going, than Sgt. Bergdahl's is here.
But then, this is just my opinion, don't ya know
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read