Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

louielouie

(42 posts)
23. Because it is a regressive tax.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 03:34 PM
Jun 2014

I said "price discrimination"--that is, a way of allocating scarce resources by making them less available to the poor. It is discrimination against the poor, even if the minimum wage rises.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How about raising them AFTER ebbie15644 Jun 2014 #1
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! LuckyLib Jun 2014 #16
That would allow the Republicans to hold the climate to ransom muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #33
I DON'T CARE! ebbie15644 Jun 2014 #46
Timing Is Everything.... global1 Jun 2014 #2
Timing is the only thing at this time. OLDMADAM Jun 2014 #62
I know Chris - He's my senator and was my House Rep... MANative Jun 2014 #3
Large oil pay little or no taxes randr Jun 2014 #4
The #1 and #2 US corporate taxpayers are Exxon and Chevron. Psephos Jun 2014 #42
Well since some places are floating at or beyond $4 per gallon for regular Historic NY Jun 2014 #5
it's four dollars a gallon now. heaven05 Jun 2014 #6
almost $3 of every gallon is money to the oil company. 18 cents goes to our Federal gov. the rest Sunlei Jun 2014 #44
Regressive. I'm a NO bluestateguy Jun 2014 #7
Do we still have corporate welfare for oil companies? truthisfreedom Jun 2014 #8
Article doesn't say how much this would raise, but here are the stats OnlinePoker Jun 2014 #9
But that doesn't take into account christx30 Jun 2014 #41
This is needed. It's a small start. The USA has to catch up with the rest of the developed world muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #10
Yes it is needed Cryptoad Jun 2014 #11
You've got to tax the users to discourage use muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #13
That good logical thinking if ,,, Cryptoad Jun 2014 #17
Unemployment rate in 1993 was 6.9% muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #20
No, YOU can bear it. Don't presume to tell others what they can afford. Throd Jun 2014 #25
Is price discrimination the way to do this? louielouie Jun 2014 #18
Why is raising the tax back in line with inflation 'discrimination'? muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #21
Because it is a regressive tax. louielouie Jun 2014 #23
As the OP points out, the current gas tax isn't even paying for repairs to roads and bridges muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #26
There are other ways to finance public goods. louielouie Jun 2014 #28
But at the same time, use of gas needs to be discouraged muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #32
Gas needs to be replaced by other forms of energy. louielouie Jun 2014 #34
And that's what a gas tax does muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #35
It puts an undue burden on the poor. louielouie Jun 2014 #36
What is your solution to carbon dioxide emissions? (nt) muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #37
Auto manufacturers should be required by the govt to shift to electric cars. louielouie Jun 2014 #38
Do you think those would be cheaper in the short term than current fuels? muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #43
And then tax who to pay for the road repairs? OnlinePoker Jun 2014 #45
Please read my earlier posts where I address this issue. louielouie Jun 2014 #49
But this will price a few more people out of vacations. Doctor_J Jun 2014 #24
+1. louielouie Jun 2014 #31
They should double the 18 and 24 cent Federal tax and HALF the state taxes and profit money. Sunlei Jun 2014 #12
They will never cut the "profit money." louielouie Jun 2014 #19
I hear you! we can see the change as gas use drops, the price will continue to up, up, up for the Sunlei Jun 2014 #27
+1 louielouie Jun 2014 #29
THat would be nice, just how do you get the states to budge on their cash cow... Historic NY Jun 2014 #30
nice price breakdown. remember republicans nagging Pres O over gas prices? 18 cents is the Fed. tax Sunlei Jun 2014 #40
Aren't those "six federal tax breaks that expired this year" the Bush cuts for the 1%? starroute Jun 2014 #14
Bob Corker's net wealth in 2013 = $16.8 million. louielouie Jun 2014 #15
Dow-30 Earnings: Exxon Mobil Corp. – First Quarter 2014 mitty14u2 Jun 2014 #22
I am already onecaliberal Jun 2014 #39
Criminal stupidity seveneyes Jun 2014 #47
the fix is in warrprayer Jun 2014 #48
Raise taxes on a commodity that practically everyone uses and off-set with tax breaks??? Why offset kelliekat44 Jun 2014 #50
What about removing the gas industry subsidies first? nt valerief Jun 2014 #51
I assume gas tax rates are based on a percentage of the cost of gas. If gas prices doubled over the Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #52
Federal gas tax rates are a fixed amount muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #53
That explains it. Thank you. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #54
I used to deliver gas, diesel, kerosene, bulk oil,... Omaha Steve Jun 2014 #56
"Bi-partisan deal" means "bend over and grab your ankles." blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #55
Oh, for crying out loud. blue neen Jun 2014 #57
Remember Ross perot that cost Bush I a second term? Omaha Steve Jun 2014 #58
I do remember Perot. blue neen Jun 2014 #59
IT SOUNDS LIKE BATE AND SWITCH TO cynzke Jun 2014 #60
Good idea. We should also have a federal tax on food and water. Regressive taxes are da bomb! Scuba Jun 2014 #61
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senators propose 12-cent ...»Reply #23