Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Smith & Wesson: Americans are buying fewer guns [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)21. I have a 1889 Savage .303 that works great.
Costs about 20 bucks every time I fire it, but hey, it's a museum piece you can still take a deer with.
(they stopped making ammo for it in the 20's, and British .303 doesn't fit.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I wonder if this means the gun manufacturers will, paradoxically, tell the NRA to dial
Aristus
Jun 2014
#2
Not sure I buy the saturation argument. Wasn't the market pretty saturated 20 years ago too?
MillennialDem
Jun 2014
#53
Except for Curio & Relic license holders who can indeed get older guns thru the mail/online...n/t
EX500rider
Jun 2014
#38
"But Obama failed to get a bill through Congress that would have placed restrictions on these guns"
hack89
Jun 2014
#36
That may be due to the fact that everybody who ever considered that he might want ...
spin
Jun 2014
#19