Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Army Clears Bergdahl of Any Misconduct During Captivity [View all]Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)35. Not sure I get it...
What kind of misconduct could he possibly have engaged in? Revealing important information? What information could he possibly have, anyway?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They can't prove that he wasn't out "strolling around" as he had several times before.
AAO
Jun 2014
#29
NO....he was captured BEFORE he could legally be -- or was -- declared a deserter.
MADem
Jun 2014
#57
Have you ever conducted a Line of Duty investigation? I have a handful under my belt. If his
24601
Jun 2014
#80
Bergdahl had a history of going out on walks. And returning. With no reprimand
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#84
That could have relevance for determining lack of intent to remain away permanently; however,
24601
Jun 2014
#97
Yes, I have-I've been a Preliminary Inquiry Officer on dozens of investigations, I have
MADem
Jun 2014
#99
You and I must know the same guy. My guy went throught the winshield of a shipmate's car on .....
marble falls
Jun 2014
#106
Jeff & I were Army. I'm guessing that probably because of his injuries, there wasn't an Article 15.
24601
Jun 2014
#111
Those were the days. Another one I remember fom New London was two sailors in the trunk .....
marble falls
Jun 2014
#113
He was disillusioned, for good reason, wondered off his post probably to get high
randys1
Jun 2014
#6
Jesus fucking christ, you've already decided he's guilty. If he's cleared, its an Army "whitewash"
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#41
I prefer to get a clearer picture before I accuse anyone, even the Army.
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#50
Yes actually. Soldiers had wandered off before, including Bergdahl, in that area without punishment
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#20
I don't believe anything yet. But you seem to have an agenda against Bergdahl.
phleshdef
Jun 2014
#37
Here's an excellent link to the hidden agendas of the most vocal unit members
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#39
The Army enlisted a low quality recruit who washed out of Coast Guard training after three weeks.
MADem
Jun 2014
#101
For someone critical of me for making assumptions you are making quite a few yourself.
former9thward
Jun 2014
#107
I'm not making assumptions--he washed out of USCG training. That's not in dispute.
MADem
Jun 2014
#110
I don't think they'll charge him with desertion for reasons I have outlined elsewhere.
MADem
Jun 2014
#59
What they charge him with will depend on how long it took for the Taliban to capture him
jmowreader
Jun 2014
#56
McCain said himself in his memoir "Faith of my Fathers" that he gave too much info initially
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#64
I'm giving you McCain's own words. This isn't a smear. He admits he gave up a lot to get med care
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#70
Uhm, you've already said that any Army investigation that clears him is a "whitewash"
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#86
So the Right will fight against him receiving his back pay of $200,000? Is this what it has come to?
YOHABLO
Jun 2014
#63
I wonder what it is like working on that POS car in the background with a fundie
snooper2
Jun 2014
#100
I don't think the car is broken--the raised hood is a signal to the helicopters that they're in the
MADem
Jun 2014
#103