Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nyabingi

(1,145 posts)
22. As if the FDA is an honest, above-corruption organization
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 02:33 PM
Jul 2014

that isn't susceptible to political and economic pressure? We both know that the FDA has approved some pretty bad things for public consumption in the past so I wouldn't trust them to be an impartial judge as to whether the stuff making up e-liquid is safe or not. I'd be interested to see long-term studies of vaping when enough time passes, but until then, I'll cross my fingers and hope everything's on the up and up.

Standard e-liquid only has three or four ingredients - what an individual chooses to add to their own mixture is their personal business, deadly or not.

The moral of this story is that most vapers will have no problem vaping in designated areas away from people who think everything they're breathing in should be clear of anything other than what's naturally in air.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well... RobinA Jul 2014 #1
There is no scientific basis for this. It is the result of anti-tobacco bigotry and prejudice. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2014 #2
Yeah, but bigtory based on how something (someone?) looks is an accepted practice The Straight Story Jul 2014 #5
"Forces you to do it" is the wrong frame for depicting taboos on TV. alp227 Jul 2014 #11
There is no approved FDA research showing that second hand smokers are safe. pnwmom Jul 2014 #8
Those were trace amount of those toxins at negligible levels and were found in Chinese products. phleshdef Jul 2014 #18
Of course it's a ban. A ban on vaping in public places, just as the H/L says. Demit Jul 2014 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #4
This is silly... nyabingi Jul 2014 #6
It isn't silly that most people don't want to breath in your off-gas, pnwmom Jul 2014 #9
If you are in a room with another person, nyabingi Jul 2014 #14
I would think you would be aware of studies involving the products pnwmom Jul 2014 #16
You're assuming all vaping products nyabingi Jul 2014 #19
No, I'm not. But NO vaping product has submitted research to the FDA pnwmom Jul 2014 #20
As if the FDA is an honest, above-corruption organization nyabingi Jul 2014 #22
I don't care what you inhale into your body. Just don't vape in public spaces indoors. pnwmom Jul 2014 #23
Links to these "studies", please. sir pball Jul 2014 #17
Pellets of metal were found in at least one study. But if vaping is so safe, pnwmom Jul 2014 #21
I've been vaping for some time...dern...wish I could get a hit like angstlessk Jul 2014 #7
Reminds me of Morgana okasha Jul 2014 #10
I didn't think them offensive at all until . . . colorado_ufo Jul 2014 #12
That person just sounds rude as hell (nt) nyabingi Jul 2014 #15
Nutty prohibitionists strike again. JoeyT Jul 2014 #13
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Philadelphia’s Ban On ‘Va...»Reply #22