Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(90,061 posts)

10. The implication would be that they did.

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:55 PM

Jul 2014

Unless one likes the idea that it's some sort of plant to discredit them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Two 'abandoned' cylinders seized in Syria contained sarin - U.N. [View all] bemildred Jul 2014 OP

Nothing is perfect mwrguy Jul 2014 #1

Or maybe "It's a trick!" nt bemildred Jul 2014 #2

WMDS!!! WMDS!!!! FEAR!!!! FEAR!!!! BOMB THEM!!!! Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #3

If this rebel group actually had it, why didn't they use it? agentS Jul 2014 #4

Because then they lancer78 Jul 2014 #5

haven't some rebel groups crossed that bridge already? agentS Jul 2014 #6

You know for a fact that they didn't? Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #8

The implication would be that they did. bemildred Jul 2014 #10

His Statement, Sir, Does Not Seem To Endorse The Claimed Provenance The Magistrate Jul 2014 #7

Yes, it remains ambiguous. bemildred Jul 2014 #9