Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Japan’s Fukushima plant faces danger of overheating [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)35. Nice answer. Not to what I asked, though.
If the reactors were shut down, why were there three nuclear reactor meltdowns?
If the meltdowns could have been avoided, there might not have been the two (per Arnie Gundersen) or three "hydrogen gas" explosions that destroyed the containment buildings and made clean-up a nightmare, if not a practical impossibility.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
not to worry about a hurricane bearing down on 3 nuke plants, according to your puppetmasters
wordpix
Jul 2014
#23
If "It" was "shutdown within seconds of the earthquake," why all the meltdowns?
Octafish
Jul 2014
#33
uh, and now that the radioactive "assembly" pools are exceeding capacity, then what?
wordpix
Jul 2014
#24
You're really not in a position to claim injury at so-called "personal attacks" RE
FBaggins
Jul 2014
#32
One of us is in denial of common physics... the other one majored in the subject
FBaggins
Jul 2014
#40
Aw... too bad. It looks like the end of the world will have to be put on hold.
FBaggins
Jul 2014
#44