Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
12. Hmm...
Sun Jul 13, 2014, 12:27 PM
Jul 2014

Not a major problem? You know, Mr. Pope, if 2% of Americans suddenly decided to just randomly start selecting people to shoot... if 2% of all Walmart workers decided to blow up the Walmarts they work in... if 2% of all school children decided they were going to cook their teachers for breakfast...

Well, that 2%, it can actually be a pretty big number, it can actually be a pretty major, pretty huge problem. Now, I don't know, Mr. Holy Man, whether or not your facts are really accurate, or based on anything more than guessing... or maybe even a questionnaire of the clergy.. but, 2%? Still a pretty big number. Still a number that could do all kinds of really bad things.

The marriage issue is a somewhat different kettle of fish. When I was a young boy, I thought about joining the Priesthood, there were things I liked about it - like the pretty dresses you guys get to wear, the candles, incense, pretty bells and the singing. I love, to this day, the sound of church bells ringing, though I don't hear them terribly often anymore. I thought about the vow of poverty - no big deal for me, I've lived in poverty before. I thought about the sermons, about comforting the suffering, I thought about all of the good things Jesus said we should do. I also liked the idea of people calling me Father, which is something I'm sure Freud would have had a field day with.

What ultimately convinced me not to join the priesthood were a few simple things. The Catholic church's condemnation of homosexuals, the Catholic church's demonization of women (going back many centuries) the fact that, there are Catholic saints that were bloody handed butchers, Inquisitors, crusaders and so on. Finally though... what really did me in was the idea that I could never have sex. Well, maybe I could, but I'd have to lie about it, hide it, maybe masturbate in a closet or something.

Human beings are sexual creatures, Mr. Pope. It's a part of our nature - and if there is such a thing as god (agnosticism, alas, the final nail in the coffin of my clerical ambitions) then God would not have made us such if God did not intend us to express, enjoy, and even thrive upon and within that part of our nature. Otherwise, God would have to be kind of a huge asshole - and I simply refuse to believe that about any theoretical higher being, no matter what the Priests or pastors say.

Sir... you are making an even bigger mess out of an already catastrophic one. When you downplay this issue, you insult the children and families who have suffered. You make mockery, make light of their suffering - even as you are a representative from the church which perpetuated it, attempted to cover it up, and ultimately buy it's way out of a global PR nightmare.

I suffered abuse as a boy. Without going into detail about the whats and hows and such... it was not a Priest that was guilty in my case. When I went to see a DA's assistant, she informed me quite seriously that, "This is not an offense against YOU. It is an offense against the state." You know, very few things in my life have ever made me anywhere near as angry or as upset as that comment did, and still does.

I had some hope for you, Mr. Holy Man... but I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that you're something of an idiot. I guess I can't really blame you, if I had spent so many years sexually frustrated, as part of a bigoted, ignorant organization of self proclaimed holy men... well, I'd be an idiot too.

Enough is enough. You are supposed to be representative of Christ, if you can't act like one, maybe someone else needs to do your job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, only 2% that's all? Then there's no need to worry. SummerSnow Jul 2014 #1
Yep. My first thought was, "Whew, that's all huh?....... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #13
In fairness... DeadLetterOffice Jul 2014 #42
Clergy have confessions. graegoyle Jul 2014 #60
Oh, my. hlthe2b Jul 2014 #2
+1 Baitball Blogger Jul 2014 #17
Is this a joke?nt bravenak Jul 2014 #3
No. Apparently it's a real story... DonViejo Jul 2014 #6
Yeah - and just how long Plucketeer Jul 2014 #19
In all fairness the Vatican has all the information already lunatica Jul 2014 #21
I doubt that... DonViejo Jul 2014 #29
OK let me put it this way lunatica Jul 2014 #34
There is no way he can 'know'. bravenak Jul 2014 #30
The 2% is just the ones they know about... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #33
Naw, the 2% he is referring to are just the scumbags that actually got CAUGHT. Bette R. Daize Jul 2014 #56
Oh wow "definitely is a problem but it is not a major one" ????? mountain grammy Jul 2014 #4
I believe he was refering to the problem of celibacy. DCBob Jul 2014 #48
That's one out of fifty. That didn't prove the point that he hoped it would. nt ladjf Jul 2014 #5
This number means nothing to a child who's being abused perdita9 Jul 2014 #7
Yes, this is THE most important point. JNelson6563 Jul 2014 #10
If he's that certain of the numbers, why are they not routing those criminals out at once? Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #8
+1 DeadLetterOffice Jul 2014 #43
I call BS... Bryce Butler Jul 2014 #9
Unless one of them's fiddling you, in which case it's 100% . . . Journeyman Jul 2014 #11
Hmm... davidthegnome Jul 2014 #12
Your courage is greatly to be admired, and I thank you for sharing. classof56 Jul 2014 #20
Thanks.Very well stated. mahannah Jul 2014 #37
It makes me wonder what they were expecting if 2% does not equal a "major" problem. Gore1FL Jul 2014 #14
He still won't defrock Finn... Archae Jul 2014 #15
There's something like 400,000 priests Android3.14 Jul 2014 #16
What a relief. Here I was worried it was up to 2.2%. truthisfreedom Jul 2014 #18
Even 2% is too many. nt avebury Jul 2014 #22
Can I reduce my tithe by 2% Cartoonist Jul 2014 #23
Is the Catholic Church SamKnause Jul 2014 #24
I think traditionally it's been pedophiles have turned to the clergy. nt valerief Jul 2014 #51
If true, defacto7 Jul 2014 #59
Yep. valerief Jul 2014 #65
I accuse the Pope of being open about the problem and doing something about it! onehandle Jul 2014 #25
doing something? whatthehey Jul 2014 #69
Oh good! liberalmuse Jul 2014 #26
"Hardcore" pedophiles DeadLetterOffice Jul 2014 #45
Oh my god. liberalmuse Jul 2014 #57
Scary. smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #70
That is "reassuring?" Kath1 Jul 2014 #27
That's like the (awful) punchline to a really bad joke. Solly Mack Jul 2014 #28
This is an irresponsible headline, I think MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #31
One chance in fifty is still a hell of a lot of priests, considering how many there are jmowreader Jul 2014 #32
Oh, well, I guess that makes it ok then. Arkana Jul 2014 #35
Seems to me we are taking the Pope's words a bit out of context. PatrickforO Jul 2014 #36
Oh oh. I have to correct my math above. In 2008 there were 409,166 priests, not 45,000. PatrickforO Jul 2014 #39
True and I don't see anywhere where he was reassuring that it is only 2% treestar Jul 2014 #66
I'm chuckling over "clerics can marry … under Vatican tutelage.' toby jo Jul 2014 #38
2% they know about CanonRay Jul 2014 #40
2% is the average for ALL men. happyslug Jul 2014 #44
I did not know that CanonRay Jul 2014 #49
Assuming the pope isn't lying skepticscott Jul 2014 #54
You have NOT done much CYS work have you? happyslug Jul 2014 #63
Do they check a box? GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #41
Before we go one, 2% is the average for all males. happyslug Jul 2014 #46
That title is misleading... Pope Francis didnt use the word "only". DCBob Jul 2014 #47
2% my ass. nt valerief Jul 2014 #50
Truly the dumbest, stupidest, thing out of a world leader since>>>>>>>>>>>>>>????? Stuart G Jul 2014 #52
That's a misleading headline. Beacool Jul 2014 #53
So is he planning to label them? DeSwiss Jul 2014 #55
There's some question about the figure caraher Jul 2014 #58
This is an inflammatory headline. Read the interview. It was the Pope's advisors who said that. bklyncowgirl Jul 2014 #61
So, only 20000 of them? Helen Borg Jul 2014 #62
Probably similar to the number of U.S.A. football coaches. hunter Jul 2014 #64
He's the only Pope, in my lifetime, that I think will actually address this unthinkable problem. WhoWoodaKnew Jul 2014 #67
The math: If 2% of all Catholic priests are pedophiles, and each pedophile priest Zorra Jul 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pope Francis reassures th...»Reply #12