Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(11,014 posts)

6. Not inversion

Mon Jul 14, 2014, 10:42 AM

Jul 2014

Inversion is only useful when a company's non-US sales far exceed its US sales. Russell Stover has almost no sales outside the US.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lindt Buys Russell Stover in Company’s Biggest Purchase [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2014 OP

Good deal PennyK Jul 2014 #1

That's what I was just wondering. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #2

We can get Russell Stover for half-price mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2014 #3

for the serious chocolate abuser jmodden Jul 2014 #12

For those that intend to be "serious chocolate abusers" kentauros Jul 2014 #13

I hope Stover's quality remains the same, elleng Jul 2014 #5

Not inversion cosmicone Jul 2014 #6

First InBev buys Busch, now this. El Supremo Jul 2014 #7

Not really. Europeans are more labor friendly. n/t cosmicone Jul 2014 #8

Lindt does though. Chan790 Jul 2014 #16

Lindt is not a US company. cosmicone Jul 2014 #17

One that now has a US division. Chan790 Jul 2014 #19

Then it would be a reverse inversion and not an inversion n/t cosmicone Jul 2014 #20

I was thinking it would be the other way. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2014 #21

"The company will be a distant third behind Hershey Co. and Mars Inc." kentauros Jul 2014 #14

Nom nom nom shenmue Jul 2014 #15

as long as quality of Lindt doesn't go down JI7 Jul 2014 #18