Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,563 posts)
7. Last I heard the jury was still out a bit.
Mon Jul 14, 2014, 11:45 AM
Jul 2014

One of the crew said it was an air-to-air missile, but that requires heavy verification.

Others are saying that it was an surface-to-air missile but that could have been fired from something brought over from Russia into Ukraine or from Russia itself, given their range. "Buk" was one system name that was suggested, but again, verification is needed.

The area it was shot down is over near Krasnodon, which is a hot point. A lot of people from Lugansk proper said that the armored vehicles were moving "in the wrong direction," given the attacks by the Ukr forces in the north and west of the city. They were heading towards Krasnodon. If Krasnodon is cut off from the border, it'll be bad news for the rebels: They rely on near-nightly influxes of money, fighters, munitions, and armored vehicles from Russia. Tanks, APCs. It's not uncommon for the Ukr press to report on a convoy of 40 or 60 vehicles crossing the border, and a few hours later for the rebel's press to announce that they've gotten reinforcements "from elsewhere".

So a recent convoy included a series of Grad missile launchers, and a few hours later it was announced that a bunch of recently arrived Grads were deployed against the Lugansk airport and against Roskoshnoe. Claims are the convoy before that included Russian experts to help get a munitions factory and an armored vehicle repair plant up and running in Lugansk. Apparently the munitions factory was moved to Barnaul during WWII, and never fully repatriated--when it mostly moved back to Lugansk a portion of the "company" stayed in Barnaul, so they shared equipment and expertise. The Lugansk workers vanished, so the claim is they brought in workers from Barnaul. There are also claims reported as confirmed that the rebels now have T-72 tanks.

So if there's new equipment, that's where it would be spotted first, and since that transit point is so important it's where it would be employed--even if it hadn't quite crossed the border. (The polite claim is that the border guards on the Russian side are simply blind and incompetent. The less polite claim is that they're helping when not turning a blind eye.)

Note that if you go SW a ways towards D'yakovo there are new clashes in an area that has never been really quite but has become quite active in the last few days. As the Krasnodon area comes closer to being cut off from Russia, the DNR folk have been trying to reopen the border crossing at D'yakovo. They can't let their supply lines to the Fatherland be cut off and stay cut off given their heavy losses and reliance on all things Russian.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hopefully cooler heads prevail. Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #1
Our satellite images of this event should be able to prove if this happened awake Jul 2014 #2
You can't often get satellite images of real-time events muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #3
Good explanation. It works that way in movies, though. Just sayin' freshwest Jul 2014 #5
That is why I said "if we can" awake Jul 2014 #6
SBIRS could. joshcryer Jul 2014 #19
If you mean this, it's an incomplete system for tracking ballistic missiles muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #20
I think it is more capable than let on. joshcryer Jul 2014 #24
So we support the genocide perpetrated by Svoboda and Right Sektor cosmicone Jul 2014 #4
You should have watched ALL the VICE news reports on the situation snooper2 Jul 2014 #16
Why would he do that when it is easier to give the Fox News version? davidpdx Jul 2014 #28
There won't be a reaction. joshcryer Jul 2014 #18
Last I heard the jury was still out a bit. Igel Jul 2014 #7
Not sure if this can be proven. The border appears to be open, launchers could cross. I see it says freshwest Jul 2014 #8
Yes, I think the earlier times were at lower altitude muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #9
More likely it came from Disney World . . . another_liberal Jul 2014 #10
What does Russia have to lose with the internet populated by apologists? joshcryer Jul 2014 #17
I don't think we are even talking about the same thing . . . another_liberal Jul 2014 #26
Says Epcot Center quip guy... joshcryer Jul 2014 #27
We have a Gobbels wanna be davidpdx Jul 2014 #29
Seems like it. joshcryer Jul 2014 #30
and I'm not talking about this type of gobble gobble davidpdx Jul 2014 #32
Seems like it. joshcryer Jul 2014 #31
When did a surface to air missile become a "rocket"? Seems conflation of words is on purpose.... Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #11
The overwhelming majority of missiles are rockets muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #12
Missile are not generally referred to as rockets, in warfare, rockets is more general. Why call a Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #13
The BBC is using quotation marks jakeXT Jul 2014 #14
That is what I am talking about. AP is a news aggregator, you can use their stories and even Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #15
"you saw TOMATO I saw TOMÅTO..." awake Jul 2014 #22
So the rockets from Hamas are actually missiles, just like these SAM's? I see a connection in Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #23
And you point is? awake Jul 2014 #25
Ukrainian military plane shot down; pro-Russian separatists take responsibility bemildred Jul 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ukraine says plane shot d...»Reply #7