Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)

16. Oh man, it is, it really is.

Reply to Jack Rabbit (Reply #7)

Tue Jul 22, 2014, 05:55 PM

Jul 2014

This is precisely how they interpreted the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in "Uterus United." Ginsburg made it absolutely clear that nothing in the legislative history of the RFRA indicated it to be interpreted with corporate personhood.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama Judge Trolls Obamacare Opponents With Cheeky Pizza Analogy [View all] cal04 Jul 2014 OP

Yes, it is a matter of judicial philosophy.... Swede Atlanta Jul 2014 #1

I certainly hope the Supreme Court has as much common sense groundloop Jul 2014 #6

Go to the store for a loaf of bread. And if they have eggs, bring a dozen Xipe Totec Jul 2014 #2

From 7th Grade English: DemoTex Jul 2014 #14

But we are dealing with Morans here... freshwest Jul 2014 #20

Morans! my favorite! mikekohr Jul 2014 #21

The original Moran! freshwest Jul 2014 #22

They know IronLionZion Jul 2014 #3

Ham on pizza? YUCK! George II Jul 2014 #4

How about Canadian bacon? groundloop Jul 2014 #5

Ham, pineapple, barbecue sauce/chicken, taco seasonings... TwilightGardener Jul 2014 #9

'Unconstitutional!' elleng Jul 2014 #11

I know.. that whole kind of pizza it was.. kinda grossed me out. lol Cha Jul 2014 #18

Why does this sound like Judge Davis is taking a dig at Justice Scalia? Jack Rabbit Jul 2014 #7

Didn't occur to me, elleng Jul 2014 #12

Oh man, it is, it really is. joshcryer Jul 2014 #16

Excellent analysis by an excellent judge. SunSeeker Jul 2014 #8

Looking forward to reading legal analysis on this ruling perdita9 Jul 2014 #10

"...most of the recent rulings seem to have no basis in the law or historical fact -- " greiner3 Jul 2014 #13

the majority misapplies the applicable standard of review, Xipe Totec Jul 2014 #15

Yay.. love it! thanks cal~ Got it?! Pizza! Cha Jul 2014 #17

The pizza analogy of Sr. Judge Andre Davis is incorrect S_B_Jackson Jul 2014 #19