Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thesquanderer

(12,875 posts)
13. What makes you think the date is not coincidental?
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 10:36 AM
Jul 2014

Do you think the judge's office (who would set the date) has an agenda, and wanted to be able to milk something from the date?

Also, 1997 doesn't mean anything about 2000. Even if indicating what they would try to do if they won, so what? If not 2000, there was always 2004. I don't think their ability/desire to win (legally or not, as you imply) was increased or decreased by the existence of plans for what they would do if able.

I guess what I'm saying is your post sounds like unsupportable conspiracy theory stuff.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bush Administration Lawsu...»Reply #13