Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: President Obama: Weekly Address: Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes [View all]BumRushDaShow
(167,559 posts)36. One might not even need to subscribe
I listen to it on my local (CBS-affiliate) all-news radio station every Saturday morning between 6:05 am - 6:10 am ET. When they used to air Shrub's weekly address, they made sure to put it on at 10:05 am.
I.e., some local news/talk stations in the big cities do air them.
[font size="6" face="serif"]Obama holds to weekly radio tradition[/font][/font]
By Matt Viser
Globe Staff July 07, 2014
WASHINGTON It evokes an image of President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivering one of his fireside chats to a rapt radio audience. Or a bygone era when families motored to the country on a Saturday morning, tuning in to the official word from the White House. In nostalgic defiance of todays hyper-drive news cycle, the tradition endures as the Weekly Presidential Address.
While historians and current White House officials fiercely defend this packaged political ritual, there is evidence that the address has faded into near-irrelevance. It generates far less news coverage than it did when it began three decades ago, and it is so under the radar that no one is tracking its listenership or even which stations are carrying it. Is he even still doing them? asked Peter Lydotes, director of operations at WBUR, a major public radio outlet in Boston. He is.
<...>
Although the current White House took the address into the video age with recordings they hope will go viral on the Internet in essence its the same format as Roosevelt pioneered in the 1930s. It harkens to an age before news was digested and spit out in 30 seconds.
<...>
Although Roosevelt was known for his fireside chats, spoken to an America still recovering from the Great Depression, his speeches were fairly sporadic. It wasnt until 1982 that President Reagan launched a weekly address, delivered every Saturday morning.
More: http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2014/07/06/president-obama-weekly-radio-address-anachronism-that-endures/2xtr0v07pKPHcuqk6QvckN/story.html
By Matt Viser
Globe Staff July 07, 2014
WASHINGTON It evokes an image of President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivering one of his fireside chats to a rapt radio audience. Or a bygone era when families motored to the country on a Saturday morning, tuning in to the official word from the White House. In nostalgic defiance of todays hyper-drive news cycle, the tradition endures as the Weekly Presidential Address.
While historians and current White House officials fiercely defend this packaged political ritual, there is evidence that the address has faded into near-irrelevance. It generates far less news coverage than it did when it began three decades ago, and it is so under the radar that no one is tracking its listenership or even which stations are carrying it. Is he even still doing them? asked Peter Lydotes, director of operations at WBUR, a major public radio outlet in Boston. He is.
<...>
Although the current White House took the address into the video age with recordings they hope will go viral on the Internet in essence its the same format as Roosevelt pioneered in the 1930s. It harkens to an age before news was digested and spit out in 30 seconds.
<...>
Although Roosevelt was known for his fireside chats, spoken to an America still recovering from the Great Depression, his speeches were fairly sporadic. It wasnt until 1982 that President Reagan launched a weekly address, delivered every Saturday morning.
More: http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2014/07/06/president-obama-weekly-radio-address-anachronism-that-endures/2xtr0v07pKPHcuqk6QvckN/story.html
Agree that it doesn't fit the narrative of "he's not getting out there with messaging" or the "He should do radio addresses like FDR" nonsense.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And thats the point. Do we want more govt revenue, or rates that make you "feel good".
7962
Jul 2014
#39
There isnt anything wrong with lower rates providing though that the companies actually pay
cstanleytech
Jul 2014
#7
A person has to be interested enough to subscribe to them, but some don't listen as it disturbs the
freshwest
Jul 2014
#32
He also commented that CEO responsibility is not just short term profits for shareholders..
DCBob
Jul 2014
#13
AgreeBut why do teabaggers usually support this corporate crap while claiming to be super patriotic
lunasun
Jul 2014
#16
So tax all money earned in the US, whether taxes are paid on it elsewhere or not.
JDPriestly
Jul 2014
#18
Just make them state they do not pay American taxes on their product or service....
Uben
Jul 2014
#19
Ok Mr. President - Then Close The Loophole With An Executive Order - Then Expose The Fraud In The Courts
cantbeserious
Jul 2014
#22