Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Federal judge declares D.C. ban on carrying handguns in public unconstitutional [View all]S_B_Jackson
(906 posts)30. Legally, I don't think it will be quite the cluster-fuck that you claim...
http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/guns-national-parks-firearms-now-allowed-yellowstone-yosemite/story?id=9910171
firearms are already allowed in National Parks due to a change in federal law that went into effect in 2010. Put simply, if the locale in which a National Park is situated allows the carry (whether concealed or open) of firearms in parks, then so too is it allowed in National Parks.
The Washington Monument, Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials, and the WWII, Iwo Jima, Korean War, Vietnam, and Martin Luther King Memorials would be open to carry while the federal courts, Capitol Building, and White House areas would need to be signed against carrying. Washington DC police will need to be trained to know what is and is not legal as well as the best method of low-intensity interaction with those legally carrying firearms.
Since it rarely is a problem in other jurisdictions - with the notable exception of Philadelphia - I believe that DC police can be properly trained if the DC City Council and Chief Lanier choose to make it a priority.
firearms are already allowed in National Parks due to a change in federal law that went into effect in 2010. Put simply, if the locale in which a National Park is situated allows the carry (whether concealed or open) of firearms in parks, then so too is it allowed in National Parks.
The Washington Monument, Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials, and the WWII, Iwo Jima, Korean War, Vietnam, and Martin Luther King Memorials would be open to carry while the federal courts, Capitol Building, and White House areas would need to be signed against carrying. Washington DC police will need to be trained to know what is and is not legal as well as the best method of low-intensity interaction with those legally carrying firearms.
Since it rarely is a problem in other jurisdictions - with the notable exception of Philadelphia - I believe that DC police can be properly trained if the DC City Council and Chief Lanier choose to make it a priority.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Federal judge declares D.C. ban on carrying handguns in public unconstitutional [View all]
NickB79
Jul 2014
OP
ok, I'll play. Maybe they should modify the ban to exclude a single-shot flint-lock muzzleloader
tomm2thumbs
Jul 2014
#8
I'll concede you may be our local expert on child porn, but deny you have any expertise on the law.
24601
Jul 2014
#24
So their intent was military state of the art individual weapon. Thanks for admitting it was not a
24601
Jul 2014
#22
Oh hell,...you KNOW Bubba and Skeeter are loadin' up the truck with ammo and beer now.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#40