Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ballyhoo

(2,060 posts)
12. You apparently did not read [understand] my answer to your post. I was talking about ME
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 07:04 PM
Jul 2014

being called a "putin apologist troll"--not you! Here. Read it again. [font color=red]Thank for your response. It sure beats "You're a Putin apologist troll."[/font] See it was me--not you. I think we may have a language problem here. I can tell that mainly by your usage of the past tense of the "state of being" verbs, ie, "was" used when "were" should have been used. I'm sorry if I offended you somehow, Diocletian; it was not my intent. I can't find anything contentious in my entire response to you. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian Lawmakers Draft B...»Reply #12