Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US Postal Service loses $2B this spring [View all]Triana
(22,666 posts)45. That it's a requirement no other govt or private entities
must follow, makes it an extreme mean-to-destroy poison pill bill, IMO - foisted on this agency by Republicans who hate public services and want them all privatized. And they are driven by private entities which will profit handsomely from said privatization (and they probably don't fund their retirement/health plans 100% either and never will - if they even have such plans).
Will have to disagree on the intent of this crap. IMO, (and that of many others) it's meant to destroy the USPS - partially why it's 10 years and not 20 or 25 at least.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why then is the USPS held to fiduciary standards no other organization is?
LanternWaste
Aug 2014
#27
I believe the post office also used to sell government bonds. I wish they would do
LoisB
Aug 2014
#31