Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Before Killing James Foley, ISIS Demanded Ransom From U.S. [View all]Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)19. Not bullshit.
We negotiate with terrorists all of the time ... if they have something to offer, like destabilizing a regime we don't like.
Your post is the one that's bullshit. They kidnap people regardless.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama said "we don't pay ransom monies" but europe does, and did, and got their prisoners.
TheNutcracker
Aug 2014
#1
Is this going to become the next House GOP investigation? Why didn't Obama pay a ransom?
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#16
Either action or inaction on ransoms is a loser. Paying gets more hostages taken but saves lives.
kelliekat44
Aug 2014
#95
1) The US Army had a clear responsibility to bring Bergdahl home, since they put
TwilightGardener
Aug 2014
#14
One might think that anyone resorting to the petulance of "brilliant repartee" would have sourced th
LanternWaste
Aug 2014
#96
I would gladly be activated from Reserve status to help exterminate this vermin.
IronGate
Aug 2014
#63
And in the process, fund the opposition to more effectively carry our further ransom activities.
LanternWaste
Aug 2014
#97
A sad truth. Poor Foley. Sure seemed like a great dude. He knew what he was getting into. Man,
zonkers
Aug 2014
#83
Your post covers it why it's not wise to pay terrorists for ransom, flamingdem.. So sad for
Cha
Aug 2014
#81
One hundred million dollars for more weapons to kidnap more people so they can do it again?
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#15
This has NOTHING to do with the "macho" characteristic you are inferring. These animals have been
still_one
Aug 2014
#29
no you can't. This is going after a criminal element who are killing innocent civilians, mostly
still_one
Aug 2014
#31
It isn't war. It's a response to terrorists who can't wait to attack us in the US
lunatica
Aug 2014
#80
Pay ransom, get more hostages taken, it becomes an industry all unto itself.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2014
#12
Pay ransom, allows Isil to buy more weapons, and kill more people. Hmmmm. Not rocket science
still_one
Aug 2014
#32