Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cleduc

(653 posts)
2. One curious thing:
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 09:05 AM
Aug 2014

where's the sound of the shot that supposedly happened in the car? According to the accounts I've read or heard, he didn't shoot six times in the car. It was one shot.

The sound of the shots is quite clear. The car window had to be open for the struggle. Why don't we hear that first shot? I expect it wasn't as loud because it was in the car but those shots are so clear outside the car, I would have expected to hear something from the open window of the car. Maybe it's before the part of the tape CNN played?

The other thing the officer will have to explain are two general decisions to shoot: the first burst and the second burst. There's some time in between to deliberate so two separate decisions got made to use deadly force. Can he really convince that his life or the lives of others was in danger both times? Can he defend that he didn't put other innocent lives in more danger by rattling off all those shots on a residential street -many that missed? I think he's got a real problem there and the audio pause really helps to accentuate that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WOW!!!! heaven05 Aug 2014 #1
One curious thing: cleduc Aug 2014 #2
I doubt the officer will be explaining anything... HooptieWagon Aug 2014 #6
I agree cleduc Aug 2014 #10
Excellent, excellent point. n/t OneGrassRoot Aug 2014 #14
Maybe the recorder wasn't turned on until after the 1st shot was heard. candelista Aug 2014 #17
Actually, I think it might be 11 shots. Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 #3
Witness was on computer with video conference... HooptieWagon Aug 2014 #4
That's right. That's what makes it so credible. Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 #8
I am kind of ignorant on guns rurallib Aug 2014 #5
No. Officer almost certainly not using a 6-shot revolver. HooptieWagon Aug 2014 #7
thank you rurallib Aug 2014 #9
It also fits the officers story lancer78 Aug 2014 #11
Really? spinbaby Aug 2014 #12
+1 Myrina Aug 2014 #15
Really? lancer78 Aug 2014 #20
Officer doesn't have a story. HooptieWagon Aug 2014 #13
Not one of the eye witnesses said Michael Brown "charged" the officer csziggy Aug 2014 #19
the link led to another demigoddess Aug 2014 #16
You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead. candelista Aug 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Attorney: New audio revea...»Reply #2