Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Sanders weighs Clinton challenge [View all]pnwmom
(110,261 posts)70. He doesn't have the national support and campaign organization to win. The Democratic candidate will
have a decent chance, no matter who that candidate is. All Sanders would do as a third party candidate is throw the election to the Rethugs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
162 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yep. That's why I said "what's left." I mailed in my primary ballot for Edwards...
yurbud
Aug 2014
#114
i did the same exact thing. mailed my ballot the day before edwards dropped out..
frylock
Aug 2014
#137
Far better person, and far better Democrat (despite not technically being one)...
True Blue Door
Aug 2014
#4
They have to sell their soul and our office for the almighty campaign dollar. This is how the
Dustlawyer
Aug 2014
#56
Hillary is, for better or worse, the presumptive Dem nominee in 2016, as polls show her beating
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#91
That is most certainly true! But such is HRC's 'pull' currently that Warren has
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#96
Actually, Warren promised her constituents that she wouldn't pull a Palin
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2014
#151
It's a different thing to run nationally. If he runs 3rd party he will toss the election
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#17
Ralph Nader, 2000. Took more than 97,000 votes in Florida, the state that decided the election.
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#24
If Bernie runs as a Democrat, I will have no problem with that. But if he loses the primary
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#30
Bernie can't 'leave' the party, since he's not a member of it currently. Don't know enough
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#93
Only declared Democrats can run in the primary. If he left it afterwards, he'd be a turncoat,
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#103
He would have to declare himself a Democrat in order to run in the Democratic primaries.
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#116
Yeah, I take your point. And my understanding seems to match yours, i.e., that he
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#119
SCOTUS would never have heard the case if Nader hadn't drawn 97000 votes in Florida.
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#44
So it was SCOTUS that did it? Now I am confused. Someone needs to make up their mind. n/t
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#57
Nader appealed to SCOTUS? I thought it was Bush and Cheney that appealed to the Supremes.
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#63
They would have had nothing to appeal if Nader hadn't gotten 97,000 votes in Florida.
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#64
It's a horrible thing when we have more than two candidates to choose from and vote for...
LanternWaste
Aug 2014
#109
It is when it splits the progressive vote and tosses the election far to the right of both.
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#112
I know -- it's just sooooo confusing when someone says an event has more than one cause.
Jim Lane
Aug 2014
#123
Yes, he had the right to run. But if he had cared more for his progressive causes
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#144
Austrialia has 15 parties running, and no shit and shittier forever on ballots
TheNutcracker
Aug 2014
#66
You seem to be missing the problem, Gore lost because they stopped the recounts.
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#82
You can deal in "If's" all day if you want, but in the end it was the Supreme Court that cost Gore
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#128
Ah, yes you're right Ms. Harris has lots to be ashamed of as do many others.
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#129
I understand not wanting to write a novel, especially with Nader now less relevant than Sarah Palin.
Jim Lane
Aug 2014
#139
You are probably right, if Nader hadn't run Gore would have most likely won.
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#140
Yes Oh come on... Let's keep blaming Nader instead of who really stole the election.
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#85
<sigh> It isn't about just one thing, but the Nader apologists just can't accept that he had some
Adrahil
Aug 2014
#90
Unless Warren is the candidate, the election will be decided more by the stay at homes,
truedelphi
Aug 2014
#50
He doesn't have the national support and campaign organization to win. The Democratic candidate will
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#70
Not in time for the election. How would he get himself on the ballots of 50 states?
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#72
How soon before January does someone have to become a registered Democrat....
George II
Aug 2014
#12
Well, we've had a Catholic President, seems like it would be a good time for our first
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2014
#152
if they vote.. I don't know. takes a dreamer to make a dream come true, right?
Voice for Peace
Aug 2014
#110
We weren't supposed to be ready for a Catholic President either. Or an African-American one.
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2014
#45
From his positions of defense of the US, I suspect he will have a big change on his position if he
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#36
Just Allowing Room For All The HRC Supporters To Breath - Some Become Vituperative
cantbeserious
Aug 2014
#59
When Bernie Sanders endorses Clinton after the Primaries, how will you react?
brooklynite
Aug 2014
#148
With the same cynical attitude that I have towards the cheerleaders before the event.
Nihil
Aug 2014
#159
Keep dreamin - Hillary is bought and paid for by Wall Street. End of story.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Aug 2014
#83
If Sanders really wanted to fire up the base, he'd pre-announce Kshama Sawant of Socialist
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#94