Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Laughing Mirror

(4,185 posts)
72. I'm not presenting an argument
Fri Aug 29, 2014, 12:15 PM
Aug 2014

I am asking a question. Why is this recording not considered conclusive? And what does that mean? Does that mean that it cannot be used as evidence? And if it cannot be used as evidence, why not? What kind of story can the police concoct to discredit it?

You see, all I have are questions. I have no argument to present.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R pnwmom Aug 2014 #1
But ... Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #2
just stop... handmade34 Aug 2014 #3
Just stop what? Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #57
your post just caught me handmade34 Aug 2014 #60
How would someone know to "dub" them the exact second Brown was shot? SunSeeker Aug 2014 #5
They wouldnt but the next step will be cstanleytech Aug 2014 #7
The defense would have to come up with louis-t Aug 2014 #9
All they have to do is ask the guy "Were you watching a movie? No? OK, then." nt MADem Aug 2014 #70
The dude was not watching a movie. SunSeeker Aug 2014 #11
Hey I agree the chances of it being a movie are remote cstanleytech Aug 2014 #21
It was authenticated by Glide. SunSeeker Aug 2014 #22
it was authenticated to time Niceguy1 Aug 2014 #27
Exactly. nt cstanleytech Aug 2014 #31
And the dude who gave the tape to the lawyer just happened to live in Canfield Green apartments alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #35
Too True, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #36
Chicago, brother alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #37
They sound very fast. Could you hazard a guess as to what kind of gun the shooter was using? freshwest Aug 2014 #38
Not Really, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #42
Thanks. I guess what I'm really asking, was this an 'automatic'? I've only fired single shots. freshwest Aug 2014 #43
A Man Pulling The Trigger Of A Semi-Auto Piece Just As Fast As He Could, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #45
Which could account for the four (or more) misses. Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2014 #73
echoes, reverb jberryhill Aug 2014 #51
Not That Much To Check, Sir, Really The Magistrate Aug 2014 #52
+1 nt Live and Learn Aug 2014 #77
I haven't read the article, but the endpoint locations are very knowable. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2014 #44
not sure if that was done or not Niceguy1 Aug 2014 #46
all you need qazplm Aug 2014 #65
if justice is left in the hands heaven05 Aug 2014 #28
Where they hold the trial is an entirely diffent subject than the matter at hand which is the audio cstanleytech Aug 2014 #33
true heaven05 Aug 2014 #34
" The audio tape tells the story. " Only if its authentic and even then its not all of cstanleytech Aug 2014 #39
Ahhh . . . that's what the post is about. It WAS authenticated. nt brush Aug 2014 #47
Yes, the time has been authenticated but the content has yet to be by the FBI cstanleytech Aug 2014 #48
And they'd have to prove it was dubbed exactly as Brown was being killed and valerief Aug 2014 #62
Incredibly damning evidence indeed Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #58
Wait, what? AverageJoe90 Aug 2014 #13
I'm having trouble too Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #55
Good Lord..... BronxBoy Aug 2014 #18
I'm not pissing on anybody except that "inconclusive" Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #54
I see. So are you willing to discuss this or is this a drive-by? Hello? Hello? rhett o rick Aug 2014 #50
Yes, I'm willing to discuss this Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #56
Funny how everyone is shitting on you but not responding to your valid question elias7 Aug 2014 #59
Obviously there is something wrong Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #69
IMO asking questions is not the best way to present an argument. Just my opinion. nm rhett o rick Aug 2014 #71
I'm not presenting an argument Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #72
well goodness qazplm Aug 2014 #64
Yes, it is quite competent evidence Laughing Mirror Aug 2014 #68
...because in Ferguson there's always shots being heard? L0oniX Aug 2014 #66
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2014 #4
k & R Hari Seldon Aug 2014 #6
The hunt for the truth continues... Blue Idaho Aug 2014 #8
I listened twice and I'm pretty sure there were more that 7 shots. mackerel Aug 2014 #10
Well, there would be Ineeda Aug 2014 #12
CNN video says 11 shots with a pause. Will post below. freshwest Aug 2014 #40
That is what I counted. nt Live and Learn Aug 2014 #78
shots smakson Aug 2014 #14
??????? BronxBoy Aug 2014 #15
The answer is zero. RoverSuswade Aug 2014 #20
Michael Brown is now the one who gunned down Darren Wilson? Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 #23
Maybe Brown shot himself, Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 #74
you're mistaken on the shooting perp heaven05 Aug 2014 #30
4 posts by smakson - is it ambiguity in the writing or intentionally misleading? mackerel Aug 2014 #49
More than 7 beemer27 Aug 2014 #16
There shouldn't have been one... BronxBoy Aug 2014 #17
Absolutely true. Louisiana1976 Aug 2014 #79
K&R ReRe Aug 2014 #19
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #24
You're a cute one; where do you usually troll? tea and oranges Aug 2014 #25
must be a lost discussionist nashville_brook Aug 2014 #26
lmah? Rose Siding Aug 2014 #29
I know, you believe heaven05 Aug 2014 #32
Enjoy your stay. L0oniX Aug 2014 #67
VIDEO of the now authenticated CNN clip: freshwest Aug 2014 #41
I believe the time and day and the person speaking on it are verified davidpdx Aug 2014 #53
All I can say is good. Xyzse Aug 2014 #61
Wow, I was very skeptical, but this is good to help paint the picture of what happened. cbdo2007 Aug 2014 #63
They will figure out how to mold Wilson's story to the information/evidence Cosmocat Aug 2014 #75
SO, and I am assuming this is authentic... logosoco Aug 2014 #76
K&R Louisiana1976 Aug 2014 #80
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Michael Brown A...»Reply #72