Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
2. Reagan appointed tool.....
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 01:29 PM
Sep 2014
On June 22, 2010, Judge Feldman issued a preliminary injunction blocking a six month moratorium on deep-water offshore drilling in Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC v. Salazar. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs indicated that the Obama administration intended to immediately appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.[3]

Feldman's 2008 financial disclosure report[4] indicates that in that year, he owned stock in Transocean (worth under $15,000), the company that owned the Deepwater Horizon rig, as well as in other oil companies which would be affected by the moratorium.[5] A federal judge is required to consider recusal when he owns shares in one of the parties in the case before him, however none of the companies listed in Feldman's 2008 disclosure were directly involved in the action against Salazar.

Judge Feldman's 2009 financial disclosure report[6] indicates that he had financial investments in multiple BlackRock funds, each valued under $15000, much like the prior year. Although Blackrock was said to be the largest holder of BP stock,[citation needed] it's not clear that any of these funds held stock in BP. Feldman held stock in Exxon-Mobil during the hearing on the drilling moratorium and from June 8 to June 21, he issued several orders related to the moratorium case. On June 22, at the "opening of the stock market", he reportedly sold his Exxon-Mobil stock. Hours later, he issued his ruling lifting the moratorium.[7]

As of the June 9, 2010 amended complaint, Transocean, Black Rock, BP and Exxon-Mobil were not plaintiffs in the action.[8]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Leach-Cross_Feldman

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Typical of a judge from Louisiana. appleannie1 Sep 2014 #1
Reagan appointed tool..... msanthrope Sep 2014 #2
But isn't that unconstitutional and doesn't Federal law supercede State law? BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #3
The Supreme Court has not yet made a final definitive ruling on the issue. totodeinhere Sep 2014 #11
Federal Law does not always supersede State Law Lurks Often Sep 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #24
bah uppityperson Sep 2014 #4
"states have the right to define marriage" Mike Daniels Sep 2014 #5
Exactly! SoapBox Sep 2014 #6
"states have the right to define marriage" Veilex Sep 2014 #16
States have the right to hold on to hate and discrimination LynneSin Sep 2014 #29
His legal reasoning shows he makes Clarence Thomas look like a genius dbackjon Sep 2014 #7
I'm sure they're good buddies... Veilex Sep 2014 #15
I understand that Feldman is friends with Scalia. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #25
The GOP is grasping for a tree branch as it sinks in quick sand. C Moon Sep 2014 #8
Will be appealed to the 5th Circuit - TBF Sep 2014 #9
The 5th is just more Feldmans. On to SCOTUS. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #26
Yeah, I'm familiar with them - TBF Sep 2014 #30
on what grounds? this jerk will get overturned if it goes to the SC still_one Sep 2014 #10
Is he trying to force a Supreme Court ruling? Generic Other Sep 2014 #12
Wouldn't surprise me... Veilex Sep 2014 #14
U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman clearly has failed to see the writing on the wall... Veilex Sep 2014 #13
How much was the judge paid? dickthegrouch Sep 2014 #17
It won't stand.... ReRe Sep 2014 #19
Judge Feldman is a dipshit. He should be impeached. Louisiana1976 Sep 2014 #20
The case for Feldman's impeachment was made in 1010 PDittie Sep 2014 #36
Of course, it does, cuz, hey, America. Jesus. nt valerief Sep 2014 #21
Boycott Louisiana? NoMittens Sep 2014 #22
Isn't saying that Louisiana need not recognize gay marriages from other states Fortinbras Armstrong Sep 2014 #23
We need a bakery, catering service, or some other gay owned/operated business to get in this mix. Amimnoch Sep 2014 #27
Hey, "judge," your prejudice is showing... blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #28
Dumbass. Hissyspit Sep 2014 #31
Dipstick 80 year old judge appointed by Saint Ronnie, should have retired a long time ago. nt Fla Dem Sep 2014 #32
I disagree with his ruling too, and I am confident that it will eventually be overturned. totodeinhere Sep 2014 #37
UN FUCKING BELIEVABLE! William769 Sep 2014 #33
The SCOTUS put a stay on the TN 4th Circuit ruling, now with this ruling NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #34
I wonder how many gay couples have married in the U.S.? SoapBox Sep 2014 #38
True, but NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #39
RW judges have erased the first ten Amendments; now they're working on the other seventeen. baldguy Sep 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Federal Judge U...»Reply #2