Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Ukraine Cites 15,000 Russian Troops and Rebels Amid Putin's 'Take Kiev' Remark [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)77. Here's my response to your 4 points.
1. The neocon push for a regime change in Ukraine under the auspices of the CIA is successful with cookies and right wing militia etc.
Cookies? Right wing militia? Let's just say that the Ukrainian military has dealt with much, much better armed and much more numerous militia in eastern Ukraine. I suspect they would have been able to handle security had Yanukovych decided to stay put and let them do their job.
On February 20 the chairman of the Supreme Council of Crimea Vladimir Konstantinov traveled to Moscow where he announced that the Autonomous Republic of Crimea will secede from Ukraine if there would change of power.
On February 21 President Yanukovich signed an agreement to remain as president until elections were held in December. He has full control of the military and security forces. A few hours later he decides to take his money and run - to Russia. There's the "change in power" that Putin and Konstantinov were looking for 24 hours earlier. Within a month Russia has annexed Crimea.
2. Russia, not wanting to lose the bases in crimea, annexes it as a logical reaction - whether you like it or not.
In 2010 the Kharkiv Pact was "a treaty between Ukraine and Russia whereby the Russian lease on naval facilities in Crimea would be extended beyond 2017 by 25 years (to 2042) with an additional 5 year renewal option (to 2047) in exchange for a multiyear discounted contract to provide Ukraine with Russian natural gas."
There was no threat to Russia's bases in Crimea. That is a pretext.
Now Russia has a better deal. They have the bases forever and they don't have to provide Ukraine with the discounted natural gas that was their part of the agreement.
If Japan decides the it no longer wants to renew the lease on the US base in Okinawa, the US has no right to invade Okinawa to prevent the loss of an important naval base.
3. Russia, in order to destabilize the CIA installed government in Ukraine creates unrest.
"We certainly agree that Russia in order to destabilize ... creates unrest."
If it is a "CIA installed government" in Kiev, Russia had better arrest Yanukovich for cooperating with a CIA plot. If he had not left and gone to Russia - asylum in exchange for Crimea? - he would still be in office and the country would be preparing for elections in December. Of course, Crimea would still be part of Ukraine so I can see the downside for Russia if Yanukovych had not decided that life would be better in Russia.
4. There is a propaganda war trying to discredit Russia at every step.
There are propaganda wars discrediting the government in Kiev, the separatists in the East, the Russian government, the US government, European governments and everyone else.
I don't excuse excuse the actions of any government or group simply because someone else is spouting propaganda about them.
The NGO's report may be accurate. It may not. Any government does not have the right to classify an NGO as a 'foreign agent' just because it releases information that the government would like to keep hidden. If the information they release is inaccurate, counter it with the facts. Don't try to silence them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ukraine Cites 15,000 Russian Troops and Rebels Amid Putin's 'Take Kiev' Remark [View all]
Purveyor
Sep 2014
OP
Russia conquered Crimea, supports the rebels, sent tanks, jokes about invading Kiev...
DetlefK
Sep 2014
#1
The 15,000 figure seems to have come from a Russian NGO, Committee of Soldiers' Mothers.
pampango
Sep 2014
#13
The analogy is preposterous. But that aside, Ukraine's government is democratically elected.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#21
You said there wasn't a democratically elected government in Ukraine. That's just not true.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#32
No one was disenfranchised by the Ukrainian government in the May presidential election.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#67
Except those pictures of ballot boxes with trash in them were just western propaganda
davidpdx
Sep 2014
#80
So who was the small group? And how was Yanukovych forcibly removed from the country? nt
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#52
But a large group of soldiers' mothers may be able to piece together information from
pampango
Sep 2014
#18
And any effort to determine that number without the consent of the 'top military leadership' is
pampango
Sep 2014
#25
And who says that this "Committee of Soldiers' Mothers" is a funded by Western interests?
pampango
Sep 2014
#30
"Like I said, you choose to believe things that you want to be true. I am a skeptic."
pampango
Sep 2014
#40
Again you accuse the Russian NGO of being "Western aid-dependent" without offering any proof. Just
pampango
Sep 2014
#45
If you presume that Russians concerned with peace and human rights must be foreign-funded
pampango
Sep 2014
#62
That type of audit cannot happen. It is prohibited under the 2012 NGO law Putin signed.
pampango
Sep 2014
#69
And yet you were willing to accept an audit done by an international accounting firm.
pampango
Sep 2014
#73
"The credibility of the NGO's shall remain suspect." There is no proof you would accept otherwise
pampango
Sep 2014
#75
Until July 2012 it was perfectly legal for NGO's in Russia (as in all but the most authoritarian
pampango
Sep 2014
#70
Aw, Pootie, sweet sweet Pootie, I knew you'd finally invade when your hired goons couldn't
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#22