Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
77. Here's my response to your 4 points.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 01:42 PM
Sep 2014
1. The neocon push for a regime change in Ukraine under the auspices of the CIA is successful with cookies and right wing militia etc.

Cookies? Right wing militia? Let's just say that the Ukrainian military has dealt with much, much better armed and much more numerous militia in eastern Ukraine. I suspect they would have been able to handle security had Yanukovych decided to stay put and let them do their job.

On February 20 the chairman of the Supreme Council of Crimea Vladimir Konstantinov traveled to Moscow where he announced that the Autonomous Republic of Crimea will secede from Ukraine if there would change of power.

On February 21 President Yanukovich signed an agreement to remain as president until elections were held in December. He has full control of the military and security forces. A few hours later he decides to take his money and run - to Russia. There's the "change in power" that Putin and Konstantinov were looking for 24 hours earlier. Within a month Russia has annexed Crimea.


2. Russia, not wanting to lose the bases in crimea, annexes it as a logical reaction - whether you like it or not.

In 2010 the Kharkiv Pact was "a treaty between Ukraine and Russia whereby the Russian lease on naval facilities in Crimea would be extended beyond 2017 by 25 years (to 2042) with an additional 5 year renewal option (to 2047) in exchange for a multiyear discounted contract to provide Ukraine with Russian natural gas."

There was no threat to Russia's bases in Crimea. That is a pretext.

Now Russia has a better deal. They have the bases forever and they don't have to provide Ukraine with the discounted natural gas that was their part of the agreement.

If Japan decides the it no longer wants to renew the lease on the US base in Okinawa, the US has no right to invade Okinawa to prevent the loss of an important naval base.


3. Russia, in order to destabilize the CIA installed government in Ukraine creates unrest.

"We certainly agree that Russia in order to destabilize ... creates unrest."

If it is a "CIA installed government" in Kiev, Russia had better arrest Yanukovich for cooperating with a CIA plot. If he had not left and gone to Russia - asylum in exchange for Crimea? - he would still be in office and the country would be preparing for elections in December. Of course, Crimea would still be part of Ukraine so I can see the downside for Russia if Yanukovych had not decided that life would be better in Russia.


4. There is a propaganda war trying to discredit Russia at every step.

There are propaganda wars discrediting the government in Kiev, the separatists in the East, the Russian government, the US government, European governments and everyone else.

I don't excuse excuse the actions of any government or group simply because someone else is spouting propaganda about them.


The NGO's report may be accurate. It may not. Any government does not have the right to classify an NGO as a 'foreign agent' just because it releases information that the government would like to keep hidden. If the information they release is inaccurate, counter it with the facts. Don't try to silence them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Russia conquered Crimea, supports the rebels, sent tanks, jokes about invading Kiev... DetlefK Sep 2014 #1
Of course, who wouldn't believe.... ballyhoo Sep 2014 #2
A close friend who is from Poland is watching this very closely. Javaman Sep 2014 #3
A little premature. Poland is not a Russian border country... ballyhoo Sep 2014 #5
No but it's on the border of the Ukraine. nt Javaman Sep 2014 #6
Putin is not interested in West Ukraine. ballyhoo Sep 2014 #10
So he says.... IronGate Sep 2014 #12
Ah yes. Anyone who disagrees is a "pootie-lover" Scootaloo Sep 2014 #26
I'm not calling you a Putin lover, IronGate Sep 2014 #28
I was referring to what you said to Ballyhoo, actually Scootaloo Sep 2014 #29
Fine. Let's try an experiment... Javaman Sep 2014 #31
The modern Russians are peaceful. This is not the Cold War again...yet. ballyhoo Sep 2014 #33
... Javaman Sep 2014 #34
Putin has an 87-88 percent popularity in Russia and a 67 percent popularity ballyhoo Sep 2014 #36
peaceful and smart never go hand in hand. Javaman Sep 2014 #44
About 15-20 now. ballyhoo Sep 2014 #47
15-20 what? Javaman Sep 2014 #65
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #81
The last fascist fool to invade Poland paid for that mistake dearly. roamer65 Sep 2014 #60
Indeed, we are being 'played' yet again by the 'war party'. earthside Sep 2014 #4
They're recycling Bush Era propaganda tactics CJCRANE Sep 2014 #7
Excellent, Earthside...they keep ruminating over Putin is ballyhoo Sep 2014 #9
war what is it good for absolutely nothing Billy Budd Sep 2014 #11
No one is saying Scott6113 Sep 2014 #41
Yes jamzrockz Sep 2014 #46
clever misinformation cosmicone Sep 2014 #8
The 15,000 figure seems to have come from a Russian NGO, Committee of Soldiers' Mothers. pampango Sep 2014 #13
The same logic applies cosmicone Sep 2014 #14
Lol, its always funny jamzrockz Sep 2014 #15
Ukraine has a democratically elected government. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #16
Just imagine this jamzrockz Sep 2014 #17
They won't get it n/t cosmicone Sep 2014 #20
The analogy is preposterous. But that aside, Ukraine's government is democratically elected. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #21
The problem is that the people jamzrockz Sep 2014 #23
You said there wasn't a democratically elected government in Ukraine. That's just not true. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #32
What was the voter turnout in eastern Ukaraine? ozone_man Sep 2014 #63
No one was disenfranchised by the Ukrainian government in the May presidential election. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #67
Except those pictures of ballot boxes with trash in them were just western propaganda davidpdx Sep 2014 #80
Just imagine a non-sequitor. OilemFirchen Sep 2014 #55
Can you tell me what part of jamzrockz Sep 2014 #56
Ukraine It had a Democratically electected pre Coup too Billy Budd Sep 2014 #37
And your proof of such a "coup"? nt Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #38
which one ...which country Billy Budd Sep 2014 #39
Ukraine, silly. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #42
you define it then what was it Billy Budd Sep 2014 #49
I'll let Webster's define it for me. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #50
sounds like the kiev thing Billy Budd Sep 2014 #51
So who was the small group? And how was Yanukovych forcibly removed from the country? nt Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #52
that is a question for Billy Budd Sep 2014 #53
So in other words, you don't know.... Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #54
that is your Billy Budd Sep 2014 #58
How did the actual coup happen?!?!? Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #61
"Most likely controlled by western govt's" geek tragedy Sep 2014 #24
But a large group of soldiers' mothers may be able to piece together information from pampango Sep 2014 #18
Now you're stretching it cosmicone Sep 2014 #19
And any effort to determine that number without the consent of the 'top military leadership' is pampango Sep 2014 #25
You're putting words in my mouth (or keyboard) that I didn't type cosmicone Sep 2014 #27
And who says that this "Committee of Soldiers' Mothers" is a funded by Western interests? pampango Sep 2014 #30
Has anyone actually seen 200+ death certificates cosmicone Sep 2014 #35
"Like I said, you choose to believe things that you want to be true. I am a skeptic." pampango Sep 2014 #40
Climate change and forensic evidence is not subjective cosmicone Sep 2014 #43
Again you accuse the Russian NGO of being "Western aid-dependent" without offering any proof. Just pampango Sep 2014 #45
I'd like to see the audited financial statements cosmicone Sep 2014 #48
If you presume that Russians concerned with peace and human rights must be foreign-funded pampango Sep 2014 #62
No. cosmicone Sep 2014 #64
That type of audit cannot happen. It is prohibited under the 2012 NGO law Putin signed. pampango Sep 2014 #69
awwwww too bad cosmicone Sep 2014 #71
And yet you were willing to accept an audit done by an international accounting firm. pampango Sep 2014 #73
A lot of rhetoricical conjectures but no proof that cosmicone Sep 2014 #74
"The credibility of the NGO's shall remain suspect." There is no proof you would accept otherwise pampango Sep 2014 #75
There is another point of view cosmicone Sep 2014 #76
Here's my response to your 4 points. pampango Sep 2014 #77
Would their own words suffice? reorg Sep 2014 #68
Until July 2012 it was perfectly legal for NGO's in Russia (as in all but the most authoritarian pampango Sep 2014 #70
it is still perfectly legal to receive foreign funding reorg Sep 2014 #79
Aw, Pootie, sweet sweet Pootie, I knew you'd finally invade when your hired goons couldn't TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #22
You realize how childish you sound? "Pootie, sweet sweet Pootie.." (Yeah say it aloud!) elias49 Sep 2014 #57
Sweet Beloved Pootie. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #59
pootie poot poot! nt Javaman Sep 2014 #66
+1,000,000 n/t cosmicone Sep 2014 #72
Poor misunderstood Putin.. EX500rider Sep 2014 #78
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ukraine Cites 15,000 Russ...»Reply #77