Latest Breaking News

coldbeer

(306 posts)

7. No need for petroleum ....

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Fri Sep 5, 2014, 08:05 AM

Sep 2014

Where will our military go? Something is in the wind?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton: US should lead on clean energy [View all] DonViejo Sep 2014 OP

I am assuming Hillary does not think nuclear plants are "clean energy"? djean111 Sep 2014 #1

Nuclear power is not 'clean energy'. stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #5

+1 darkangel218 Sep 2014 #13

It depends on who is talking. Trillo Sep 2014 #15

Fusion is not yet on the menu. immoderate Sep 2014 #29

No, fission is dirty, dangerous, and expensive, no matter who is talking. nt bananas Sep 2014 #36

First response was an anti Hillary response? Wow, I just dont know what to think anymore randys1 Sep 2014 #26

If Hillary is running, then you should think that perhaps some Democrats do not want her as the djean111 Sep 2014 #30

I just dont know who is who anymore. If you are anti Hillary in the extreme BUT randys1 Sep 2014 #31

We agree on a lot of things! djean111 Sep 2014 #33

How does she figure that Keystone would promote clean energy? marble falls Sep 2014 #2

+1 mahina Sep 2014 #18

Energy independence. joshcryer Sep 2014 #20

And it would infuriate me if she or Obama approve of this Keystone...the only thing I would dislike randys1 Sep 2014 #27

I just don't think Hilliary breaks the DC hack mold. I want Elizabeth Warren. marble falls Sep 2014 #41

She had my vote locked up. Until now. Sorry, cant go for IDF propaganda. stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #42

Have you seen this too?...... marble falls Sep 2014 #43

Natural Gas routinely fits the definition of "clean energy" BlueEye Sep 2014 #3

Yes, it is seen as a transition source. joshcryer Sep 2014 #21

K&R stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #4

Yes, we should! riversedge Sep 2014 #6

No need for petroleum .... coldbeer Sep 2014 #7

"selling access" — not their expertise. Deadbeat Republicans Sep 2014 #8

The Hoover Dam is not without its environmental issues The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #9

Are we full in to campaign "weasel word mode" yet? NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #10

Right, and this is followed to the dot! n/t sadoldgirl Sep 2014 #24

what you say is true, when we vote for a candidate based on electoral promises, we are called naive whereisjustice Sep 2014 #25

Stated perfectly. But you are not supposed to mention that, I believe. Ssssshhhh. djean111 Sep 2014 #35

+10000000000! marble falls Sep 2014 #44

Which book or wording do the cons use? Is there a con who is against this? Who is running? randys1 Sep 2014 #28

Her handlers told us it wasn't her place to speak out about US policy during Furgeson protests whereisjustice Sep 2014 #11

Tomorrow she announces her support for Columbus ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2014 #12

Sadly, The United States Lean Sep 2014 #14

The USA is one of the only countries shuttering coal. joshcryer Sep 2014 #22

Talk is cheap. Everyone knows the US won't DO ANYTHING. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #16

What is her position on puppies? What about apple pie? mahina Sep 2014 #17

she's doing some polls on those issues Enrique Sep 2014 #23

I would love to see the USA lead on this and climate change. What a great example. Starve the Koch's freshwest Sep 2014 #19

Unfortunately, it's empty rhetoric. joshcryer Sep 2014 #38

Perhaps, but you remind me of my Dad saying, 'Let's just give up and go out and eat some worms.' freshwest Sep 2014 #39

I completely agree, but it's insurmountable, against US interests. joshcryer Sep 2014 #40

Why should there be complaining about the US taking the lead on green energy? Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #32

This I can agree with. nt TBF Sep 2014 #34

Carter tried to tell us that Skittles Sep 2014 #37