Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
32. Why should there be complaining about the US taking the lead on green energy?
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 05:50 PM
Sep 2014

I would think this would be good for now and in the future. It will not happen overnight but it needs to speed up.

Hillary on energy issues:

100B per year by 2020 for climate change mitigation. (Jun 2014)
•Get tough with energy speculators and with OPEC cartel. (May 2008)
•Gas tax holiday, paid for by windfall oil tax. (May 2008)
•GovWatch: Gas tax holiday saves $8B; but that’s 64 cents/day. (May 2008)
•Investigate gas price manipulation; add windfall profits tax. (Apr 2008)
•FactCheck: Yes, FTC is investigating gas price manipulation. (Apr 2008)
•Cap-and-trade as president; compact fluorescents at home. (Apr 2008)
•$650 for help with energy bills to those who can’t afford it. (Jan 2008)
•FactCheck: Oil & gas giveaways stripped from final 2005 Bill. (Jan 2008)
•Investigate & move toward energy efficiency and conservation. (Oct 2007)
•Opposes Yucca Mountain; earthquake fault goes under it. (Sep 2007)
•Led delegation, with McCain, to see effects of polar warming. (Sep 2007)
•Invest in alternative energy; jobs that won’t be outsourced. (Aug 2007)
•End Big Oil tax break; $50 billion for strategic energy fund. (Jul 2007)
•Agnostic about nuclear power until waste & cost issue solved. (Jul 2007)
•FactCheck: There was no Big Oil tax break under Bush-Cheney. (Jul 2007)
•Energy Independence 2020: $50B for Strategic Energy Fund. (Jun 2007)
•Extensive funding into alternative energy. (Jun 2007)
•Will make big oil fund alternative energy research. (Feb 2007)
•$50B strategic energy fund from taxing oil companies. (Oct 2006)
•Remove energy dependence on countries who would harm us. (Jun 2006)
•Need to move toward energy efficiency and conservation. (Jan 2006)
•Supports oil reserve release & fund conservation. (Oct 2000)
Voting Record

•Ratify Kyoto; more mass transit. (Sep 2000)
•Voted YES on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jun 2007)
•Voted YES on making oil-producing and exporting cartels illegal. (Jun 2007)
•Voted YES on factoring global warming into federal project planning. (May 2007)
•Voted YES on disallowing an oil leasing program in Alaska's ANWR. (Nov 2005)
•Voted YES on $3.1B for emergency oil assistance for hurricane-hit areas. (Oct 2005)
•Voted YES on reducing oil usage by 40% by 2025 (instead of 5%). (Jun 2005)
•Voted YES on banning drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (Mar 2005)
•Voted NO on Bush Administration Energy Policy. (Jul 2003)
•Voted YES on targeting 100,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2010. (Jun 2003)
•Voted YES on removing consideration of drilling ANWR from budget bill. (Mar 2003)
•Voted NO on drilling ANWR on national security grounds. (Apr 2002)
•Voted NO on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months. (Mar 2002)
•Supports tradable emissions permits for greenhouse gases. (Aug 2000)
•Keep efficient air conditioner rule to conserve energy. (Mar 2004)
•Establish greenhouse gas tradeable allowances. (Feb 2005)
•Require public notification when nuclear releases occur. (Mar 2006)
•Rated 100% by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence. (Dec 2006)
•Designate sensitive ANWR area as protected wilderness. (Nov 2007)
•Set goal of 25% renewable energy by 2025. (Jan 2007)
•Let states define stricter-than-federal emission standards. (Jan 2008)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am assuming Hillary does not think nuclear plants are "clean energy"? djean111 Sep 2014 #1
Nuclear power is not 'clean energy'. stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #5
+1 darkangel218 Sep 2014 #13
It depends on who is talking. Trillo Sep 2014 #15
Fusion is not yet on the menu. immoderate Sep 2014 #29
No, fission is dirty, dangerous, and expensive, no matter who is talking. nt bananas Sep 2014 #36
First response was an anti Hillary response? Wow, I just dont know what to think anymore randys1 Sep 2014 #26
If Hillary is running, then you should think that perhaps some Democrats do not want her as the djean111 Sep 2014 #30
I just dont know who is who anymore. If you are anti Hillary in the extreme BUT randys1 Sep 2014 #31
We agree on a lot of things! djean111 Sep 2014 #33
How does she figure that Keystone would promote clean energy? marble falls Sep 2014 #2
+1 mahina Sep 2014 #18
Energy independence. joshcryer Sep 2014 #20
And it would infuriate me if she or Obama approve of this Keystone...the only thing I would dislike randys1 Sep 2014 #27
I just don't think Hilliary breaks the DC hack mold. I want Elizabeth Warren. marble falls Sep 2014 #41
She had my vote locked up. Until now. Sorry, cant go for IDF propaganda. stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #42
Have you seen this too?...... marble falls Sep 2014 #43
Natural Gas routinely fits the definition of "clean energy" BlueEye Sep 2014 #3
Yes, it is seen as a transition source. joshcryer Sep 2014 #21
K&R stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #4
Yes, we should! riversedge Sep 2014 #6
No need for petroleum .... coldbeer Sep 2014 #7
"selling access" — not their expertise. Deadbeat Republicans Sep 2014 #8
The Hoover Dam is not without its environmental issues The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #9
Are we full in to campaign "weasel word mode" yet? NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #10
Right, and this is followed to the dot! n/t sadoldgirl Sep 2014 #24
what you say is true, when we vote for a candidate based on electoral promises, we are called naive whereisjustice Sep 2014 #25
Stated perfectly. But you are not supposed to mention that, I believe. Ssssshhhh. djean111 Sep 2014 #35
+10000000000! marble falls Sep 2014 #44
Which book or wording do the cons use? Is there a con who is against this? Who is running? randys1 Sep 2014 #28
Her handlers told us it wasn't her place to speak out about US policy during Furgeson protests whereisjustice Sep 2014 #11
Tomorrow she announces her support for Columbus ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2014 #12
Sadly, The United States Lean Sep 2014 #14
The USA is one of the only countries shuttering coal. joshcryer Sep 2014 #22
Talk is cheap. Everyone knows the US won't DO ANYTHING. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #16
What is her position on puppies? What about apple pie? mahina Sep 2014 #17
she's doing some polls on those issues Enrique Sep 2014 #23
I would love to see the USA lead on this and climate change. What a great example. Starve the Koch's freshwest Sep 2014 #19
Unfortunately, it's empty rhetoric. joshcryer Sep 2014 #38
Perhaps, but you remind me of my Dad saying, 'Let's just give up and go out and eat some worms.' freshwest Sep 2014 #39
I completely agree, but it's insurmountable, against US interests. joshcryer Sep 2014 #40
Why should there be complaining about the US taking the lead on green energy? Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #32
This I can agree with. nt TBF Sep 2014 #34
Carter tried to tell us that Skittles Sep 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton: US shoul...»Reply #32