Latest Breaking News

SunSeeker

(57,973 posts)

14. Yes indeed.

Reply to cheapdate (Reply #7)

Fri Sep 5, 2014, 09:36 PM

Sep 2014

We are often our own worst enemies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

91 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Elizabeth Warren: When it counted most, Hillary sided with the vultures [View all] DonViejo Sep 2014 OP

When it mattered most Warren sided with the IDF, Likud and it's propaganda. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #1

Fred, did you read the entire article?... DonViejo Sep 2014 #2

A day or three back, another female Dem Congressperson, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #23

Sorry, I'm not into that conspiracy theory, "she chose it so she could be close to Wall St."... DonViejo Sep 2014 #24

I hardly think it's conspiracy theory. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #25

And how do you know that was their reason for settling in New York? George II Sep 2014 #47

I don't imagine Ms Clinton has one reason for anything. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #50

I'm sure William Jeffferson had nothing to do with it. George II Sep 2014 #59

When it matter most, H. Clinton-Sachs bowed down and gave her integrity to George Bush The Dim-Son. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #4

Shouldn't that third paragraph read "some Demorats" INdemo Sep 2014 #43

It does say "some Democrats". There certainly were Democrats that did the correct thing rhett o rick Sep 2014 #44

Sorry must have had one eye out of focus INdemo Sep 2014 #48

it's cool rhett o rick Sep 2014 #49

May be, but Elizabeth Warren said she supports Hillary for President in 2016. Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #68

I hope you aren't trying to tell us that because Sen Warren said that, that make rhett o rick Sep 2014 #76

Her support for the Israeli government DEEPLY disappointed this chile Bigmack Sep 2014 #12

Against murdering terrorists. Like most sane people would. Hillary's no fool. 7962 Sep 2014 #15

485 children would disagree with being called terrorists, but they can no longer debate you. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #40

Right. Thanks to Hamas,who put them in the line of fire. Repeatedly. On purpose. 7962 Sep 2014 #41

What I hear you saying is that if Hamas puts children in the line of fire, it's ok to fire because rhett o rick Sep 2014 #45

Sure he can - iraqis are Arabs too, and that's what he's really saying. Scootaloo Sep 2014 #51

No,I blame Cheney for that war. he would've done with or without the votes 7962 Sep 2014 #65

So you might as well vote FOR it! JackRiddler Sep 2014 #83

She's no fool is right. She has managed to amass quite a fortune since being broke in 2000. nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #77

Ha!!! OK, thats a good one. A true "rags to riches" story right there! 7962 Sep 2014 #79

And which Democrat did not side with Israel? JDPriestly Sep 2014 #55

Can't agree on veteran's benefits, school lunches, public education, or DC dogcatcher appointments.. Scootaloo Sep 2014 #57

Please explain what you are trying to say. I don't understand your post. Thanks. JDPriestly Sep 2014 #63

Goodness...that's an awfully creative paraphrase of Warren's statement. cheapdate Sep 2014 #3

You can call it an awfully creative paraphrase. I'll call it what it is: a lie. SunSeeker Sep 2014 #5

An extremist on the DU caught in a lie?!? Bring me my fainting couch! ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2014 #6

which extremist on DU was caught in a lie? DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2014 #9

Crickets.... ReRe Sep 2014 #27

Well look at that. A self proclaimed Conservative trashing a politically liberal poster rhett o rick Sep 2014 #46

It's called the Democratic Underground, rhett ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2014 #64

DU is for politically liberal posters, not conservatives. Conservatives are destroying this country rhett o rick Sep 2014 #66

Right back at you ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2014 #81

I only berate those so-called Democrats that don't support Democratic rhett o rick Sep 2014 #82

12 excellent points there. Well done. (n/t) Nihil Sep 2014 #84

It's bad enough we have to fight against the conservatives in the Republican Party rhett o rick Sep 2014 #85

In other words, you're against Senator Warren too ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2014 #86

Again I ask, what's a Conservative doing on a "politically liberal" message board? nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #87

And again, I ask, what is someone who hates all *actually elected* Democrats doing here? ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2014 #88

I don't support people just because they call themselves a Democrat. I will support those rhett o rick Sep 2014 #89

Since you don't support who Democrats democratically nominate, you're not one ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2014 #90

Again, just calling yourself a Democrat isn't enough. Anyone can do that and some bastards have rhett o rick Sep 2014 #91

I'm becoming more and more peeved cheapdate Sep 2014 #7

Yes indeed. SunSeeker Sep 2014 #14

+1 n/t MBS Sep 2014 #26

Yep, click bait lies. joshcryer Sep 2014 #8

And in this interview, Warren pointedd out that Clinton voted for the bankruptcy bill that passed JDPriestly Sep 2014 #60

She did not in fact vote for it. joshcryer Sep 2014 #72

So what's your point? That does not change who H. Clinton is. She is a tool of Wall Street rhett o rick Sep 2014 #67

Sure, she's a "tool." joshcryer Sep 2014 #71

I don't claim Sen Warren is our savoir but we know who H. Clinton is and she doesn't rhett o rick Sep 2014 #74

Elizabeth Warren avoids answering the question as to whether she will run. JDPriestly Sep 2014 #58

Weird. I can't even find where Warren used the word "vultures". Nye Bevan Sep 2014 #10

The OP subject line is faithful to the source. The OP includes actual language. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #19

He knows full well that headlines are added by an editor and often overstate for attention. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #75

Warren was a registered Republican, the party of Richard Mellon Scaife and Impeachment in the 90s onehandle Sep 2014 #11

And the Republicans of yore were to the left of SOS Clinton. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #13

Well, its gonna be up to the Dems, because the GOP has no one to beat Hillary. 7962 Sep 2014 #16

Why would the GOP even bother? NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #17

...I would settle for a Democrat vs. a DINO. SoapBox Sep 2014 #18

Hillary on unions and jobs Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #54

Wants to Fast Track the Trans Pacific Partnership, won't lift SS tax Cap. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #78

On the FICA tax cap only 9.89 percent of American workers earn more than $100,000 per year. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #80

Republicans have no one to beat her? ReRe Sep 2014 #29

Right, which would mean Clinton wins, right? 7962 Sep 2014 #35

Oh yes... I don't think I stuttered... ReRe Sep 2014 #36

True, but Hillary also said she wouldnt run for office again. nt 7962 Sep 2014 #37

Well, YOU believe she is running, don't you??? ReRe Sep 2014 #38

Oh, fuuucccckkkk! Lookout, the truth is coming out!!! Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #69

Wrong. In her book, Warren explains why she switched parties. JDPriestly Sep 2014 #61

Clinton never voted for the bill that passed. joshcryer Sep 2014 #73

, blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #20

Hillary Clinton area51 Sep 2014 #21

+1 Scuba Sep 2014 #22

+2 ReRe Sep 2014 #30

I have never understood the push for Hillary marym625 Sep 2014 #28

I remember Hillary standing up for... ReRe Sep 2014 #31

over a decade n/t marym625 Sep 2014 #32

A lack of thought or imagination Scootaloo Sep 2014 #53

I missed that argument marym625 Sep 2014 #56

Just thought I would share marym625 Sep 2014 #33

If Hillary is any flavor of Liberal, lululu Sep 2014 #34

“The issues that face us are more visible than they were before the 2008 crash" Sunlei Sep 2014 #39

I read the entire article, other than the headline no mention of vultures! George II Sep 2014 #42

The word vultures in the heading refers to the personal loan industry that preys on JDPriestly Sep 2014 #62

I'm seriously worried about Hillary's positions mvd Sep 2014 #52

Interesting how we can allow Investment Banks off the hook, but can't let students strapped with YOHABLO Sep 2014 #70