Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stonecutter357

(13,010 posts)
42. She had my vote locked up. Until now. Sorry, cant go for IDF propaganda.
Sat Sep 6, 2014, 07:17 AM
Sep 2014
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/28/elizabeth-warren-defends-_n_5733164.html
The Israeli military has the right to attack Palestinian hospitals and schools in self defense if Hamas has put rocket launchers next to them, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said last week at a local town hall, according to the Cape Cod Times.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am assuming Hillary does not think nuclear plants are "clean energy"? djean111 Sep 2014 #1
Nuclear power is not 'clean energy'. stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #5
+1 darkangel218 Sep 2014 #13
It depends on who is talking. Trillo Sep 2014 #15
Fusion is not yet on the menu. immoderate Sep 2014 #29
No, fission is dirty, dangerous, and expensive, no matter who is talking. nt bananas Sep 2014 #36
First response was an anti Hillary response? Wow, I just dont know what to think anymore randys1 Sep 2014 #26
If Hillary is running, then you should think that perhaps some Democrats do not want her as the djean111 Sep 2014 #30
I just dont know who is who anymore. If you are anti Hillary in the extreme BUT randys1 Sep 2014 #31
We agree on a lot of things! djean111 Sep 2014 #33
How does she figure that Keystone would promote clean energy? marble falls Sep 2014 #2
+1 mahina Sep 2014 #18
Energy independence. joshcryer Sep 2014 #20
And it would infuriate me if she or Obama approve of this Keystone...the only thing I would dislike randys1 Sep 2014 #27
I just don't think Hilliary breaks the DC hack mold. I want Elizabeth Warren. marble falls Sep 2014 #41
She had my vote locked up. Until now. Sorry, cant go for IDF propaganda. stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #42
Have you seen this too?...... marble falls Sep 2014 #43
Natural Gas routinely fits the definition of "clean energy" BlueEye Sep 2014 #3
Yes, it is seen as a transition source. joshcryer Sep 2014 #21
K&R stonecutter357 Sep 2014 #4
Yes, we should! riversedge Sep 2014 #6
No need for petroleum .... coldbeer Sep 2014 #7
"selling access" — not their expertise. Deadbeat Republicans Sep 2014 #8
The Hoover Dam is not without its environmental issues The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #9
Are we full in to campaign "weasel word mode" yet? NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #10
Right, and this is followed to the dot! n/t sadoldgirl Sep 2014 #24
what you say is true, when we vote for a candidate based on electoral promises, we are called naive whereisjustice Sep 2014 #25
Stated perfectly. But you are not supposed to mention that, I believe. Ssssshhhh. djean111 Sep 2014 #35
+10000000000! marble falls Sep 2014 #44
Which book or wording do the cons use? Is there a con who is against this? Who is running? randys1 Sep 2014 #28
Her handlers told us it wasn't her place to speak out about US policy during Furgeson protests whereisjustice Sep 2014 #11
Tomorrow she announces her support for Columbus ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2014 #12
Sadly, The United States Lean Sep 2014 #14
The USA is one of the only countries shuttering coal. joshcryer Sep 2014 #22
Talk is cheap. Everyone knows the US won't DO ANYTHING. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #16
What is her position on puppies? What about apple pie? mahina Sep 2014 #17
she's doing some polls on those issues Enrique Sep 2014 #23
I would love to see the USA lead on this and climate change. What a great example. Starve the Koch's freshwest Sep 2014 #19
Unfortunately, it's empty rhetoric. joshcryer Sep 2014 #38
Perhaps, but you remind me of my Dad saying, 'Let's just give up and go out and eat some worms.' freshwest Sep 2014 #39
I completely agree, but it's insurmountable, against US interests. joshcryer Sep 2014 #40
Why should there be complaining about the US taking the lead on green energy? Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #32
This I can agree with. nt TBF Sep 2014 #34
Carter tried to tell us that Skittles Sep 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton: US shoul...»Reply #42