Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia: Ukraine's NATO ambitions threaten talks [View all]Tommy_Carcetti
(44,475 posts)21. What's that have to do with anything I just said?
It's just the latest Robert Parry screed.
Do you have anything relevant to the circumstances of Yanukovych's departure, or do you want to throw out more non-sequiturs?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yanukovych had already been packing up for nearly three days when he made that agreement.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#19
He left because he was hated by the people, but he could still live rich and comfortable in Russia.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#27
But your original premise was that if Yanukovych had just been allowed to abide by the EU deal...
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#34
You claim he would have stuck around and abided by the EU deal. He wasn't going to.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#39
You know the time period between him signing the agreement and him leaving was only a few hours.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#43