Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: MH17 crash: Dutch experts say numerous objects hit plane [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)73. If by "US cover-up" you mean:
... the US hasnt lifted a finger to help the investigation even though it has the most advanced, state-of-the-art surveillance systems in the world and even though it had a satellite capable of reading a license plate from outer space hovering directly overhead at the time the aircraft blew up. ...
So why hasnt Washington been more forthcoming with the information they have? Why are they basing their judgment on the nonsense theyve gleaned from social media and Twitter feeds instead of spy-in-the-sky photos and satellite imagery? Why are they dragging their feet and obstructing the investigation? And why, for God sakes, why has Europe agreed to go along with this charade when they know theres not a scintilla of evidence linking Russia to the downed plane?
These are just some of the questions that remain unanswered a full two weeks after MH17 was downed by what appears to have been a surface-to-air missile launched from a BUK platform somewhere in east Ukraine. (Although even that fact is now in dispute given that MH17 was being allegedly being shadowed by two Ukrainian warplanes. Some analysts believe the aircraft was actually destroyed by air-to-air missiles fired from one of the two Su25 interceptors.)
http://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-unanswered-questions-of-mh17/
So why hasnt Washington been more forthcoming with the information they have? Why are they basing their judgment on the nonsense theyve gleaned from social media and Twitter feeds instead of spy-in-the-sky photos and satellite imagery? Why are they dragging their feet and obstructing the investigation? And why, for God sakes, why has Europe agreed to go along with this charade when they know theres not a scintilla of evidence linking Russia to the downed plane?
These are just some of the questions that remain unanswered a full two weeks after MH17 was downed by what appears to have been a surface-to-air missile launched from a BUK platform somewhere in east Ukraine. (Although even that fact is now in dispute given that MH17 was being allegedly being shadowed by two Ukrainian warplanes. Some analysts believe the aircraft was actually destroyed by air-to-air missiles fired from one of the two Su25 interceptors.)
http://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-unanswered-questions-of-mh17/
The preliminary report doesn't mention any of this, I doubt they have received the satellite images allegedly in the possession of US intelligence.
The Russians had a lot of specific questions and requests which don't seem to have been answered by the preliminary report either.
Russias Air Transport Agency has prepared a number of questions for Ukraine seeking to clarify the situation surrounding the crash of flight MH17.
Questions to Ukraine regarding the investigation of Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 crash
The following data shall be requested:
1. Video and audio recording of the air traffic control center communications.
2. Tape recordings of radio exchanges between the air traffic controller and adjacent air traffic control centers inter alia covering the entry into the Ukrainian airspace.
3. Recordings of radio exchanges and phone calls between the air traffic controllers and the military air traffic control sector or Ukraine Air Defense.
...
http://rt.com/politics/official-word/175584-russia-agency-questions-mh17/
Questions to Ukraine regarding the investigation of Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 crash
The following data shall be requested:
1. Video and audio recording of the air traffic control center communications.
2. Tape recordings of radio exchanges between the air traffic controller and adjacent air traffic control centers inter alia covering the entry into the Ukrainian airspace.
3. Recordings of radio exchanges and phone calls between the air traffic controllers and the military air traffic control sector or Ukraine Air Defense.
...
http://rt.com/politics/official-word/175584-russia-agency-questions-mh17/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No more and no less than you already know the Ukrainian Air Force did it...
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#84
Could be. The evidence of whether it was cannon fire or an exploding missile warhead may be resting
pampango
Sep 2014
#29
No, air to air missiles use proximity warheads to explode near the target to destroy it.
happyslug
Sep 2014
#35
Why argue now about something that esoteric and open to interrpretation . . .
another_liberal
Sep 2014
#53
But it's necessary to ramp up the public's emotions against Russia NOW!
another_liberal
Sep 2014
#20
It supports the general theory that a ground-to-air missile hit it
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2014
#45
Or if one side were somehow supplied a Buk system from one of those countries.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#75
So the rebels were lying when they claimed to shoot down Ukrainian fighters? (nt)
jeff47
Sep 2014
#68
It is NOT editorializing to report what the report says AND to add that it is consistent with
karynnj
Sep 2014
#87
It is ridiculous - and the reason is that you are being very simplistic and are holding onto RT lies
karynnj
Sep 2014
#89