Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
18. From a strategic standpoint, it's a sound battle plan.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 11:43 AM
Sep 2014

If your enemies are shooting each other, they're reducing the number of enemies you'll eventually have to fight. Assad's strategy seems to have been "Let them slaughter each other, and then take out whoever is left after the dust settles." By all accounts, he seems to have focused on simply capturing and holding the large western cities, while the various rebel groups deplete their numbers while struggling over the rest of the country.

It also places the rest of the world in a bit of a bind. By allowing the radicals to slaughter the moderates, he's creating a situation where the world has to choose between an Assad-led Syria, and a radicalized, terrorism exporting Syria. And he gets to create that situation without firing a shot. Assad is many things, but he's not stupid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Where these the "moderates"? Cayenne Sep 2014 #1
The way I understand it, they recently "distanced" themselves from al Nusra. bemildred Sep 2014 #2
Our "partners" got blowed up Cayenne Sep 2014 #6
"Why are we madder at Assad than at ISIS?" bemildred Sep 2014 #13
Perhaps they unfriended al Nusra on Facebook daleo Sep 2014 #26
Kind of a Darwin award moment for the group, then Scootaloo Sep 2014 #3
Bound to be a setback. bemildred Sep 2014 #4
So many people must be shaking their heads at the stupidity. n/t JimDandy Sep 2014 #14
One "Aw Shit!" moment like that can wipe out a dozen or so attaboys Kaleva Sep 2014 #24
I find that version hard to credit daleo Sep 2014 #27
barrel bomb, daisy-cutter glide bomb ... quadrature Sep 2014 #5
I know this appears to be an accident but... indivisibleman Sep 2014 #7
so maybe they were assassinated and maybe they blew themselves up? azurnoir Sep 2014 #8
A day later we still don't know. bemildred Sep 2014 #17
At the moment the US wants Assad's cooperation, his greatest opponents go sky high . . . Journeyman Sep 2014 #9
I don't think the US wants Assad's cooperation. But if he would attack ISIS once in a while, pampango Sep 2014 #11
You keep saying this jamzrockz Sep 2014 #12
Assad military did not attack ISIS before August when it threatened then captured the Syrian pampango Sep 2014 #15
From a strategic standpoint, it's a sound battle plan. Xithras Sep 2014 #18
+1. We would find it clever if we were doing it. Divide and rule. nt bemildred Sep 2014 #19
"Assad is many things, but he's not stupid." He certainly is not. Leaving ISIS alone pampango Sep 2014 #20
Simple. He DIDN'T choose Scootaloo Sep 2014 #25
Kind of convenient PeoViejo Sep 2014 #10
Assad is here to stay - we ought to get over it and live with it. n/t cosmicone Sep 2014 #16
I fear that our pending 'isis' strikes in Syria will just be a smokescreen to Purveyor Sep 2014 #21
Syrian Rebel Group Names New Leaders After Blast Purveyor Sep 2014 #22
Seems like a short career path. bemildred Sep 2014 #23
We could try to be the Leviathan daleo Sep 2014 #28
Yup, we could end up being Gulliver in Lilliput Art_from_Ark Sep 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Blast in Syria kills most...»Reply #18