Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
14. There is a logical fallacy...
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 08:27 AM
Sep 2014

...usually unstated, that responsibility, like matter and energy is conserved. In other words, if actor A bears, say, 20% of the responsibility for a situation with a bad outcome, then actor B can, at most be 80% responsible.

Not so.

Brandon Ellingson was responsible to some degree because he became intoxicated to the point that law enforcement officials felt the need to intervene.

But Trooper Piercy was 100% responsible because he failed to protect an intoxicated and handcuffed person in his custody, regardless of the circumstances that led up to that situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Father of handcuffed man ...»Reply #14