Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That, And a Dollar Fifty, Sir, Might Get You a Cup Of Coffee The Magistrate Sep 2014 #1
No, he has a point. rug Sep 2014 #11
Same basis as we used to get OBL in Pakistan. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #13
I asked for the legal basis, not the jingoistic basis. rug Sep 2014 #16
It's not jingoism, it's US policy under Obama. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #17
So, no legal basis, then, is the answer. n/t JimDandy Sep 2014 #24
What is meant by "legal basis"? You mean AUMF, or UN/international, or what? TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #38
Legal basis re U.N., as the other poster also inquired. JimDandy Sep 2014 #45
They could get a vote, Russia and China would object, and we'd do it anyway. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #48
Right, we do what we want, they can now do whatever they want Cayenne Sep 2014 #51
We all already do what we want. The UN is toothless and meaningless. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #52
Legal basis? We're the Goddamned United States of 'Murica. Hugabear Sep 2014 #15
It Is Not That Complicated, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #20
I agree. red dog 1 Sep 2014 #32
It is also not that legal. rug Sep 2014 #61
A Thing May Be Foolish And Fail, Sir, Without Being A Crime The Magistrate Sep 2014 #63
Foolishness is a given here. rug Sep 2014 #65
It Is Not That Difficult, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #68
Apparently citing the international law which holds that is that difficult. rug Sep 2014 #71
And You May Feel Free To Cite Something Establishing It Is Not Legal, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #74
How about Article 39 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations? rug Sep 2014 #76
Try Article 51, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #78
That's correct. "Self"-defense is an inherent right of the state attacked. rug Sep 2014 #79
Note The Word 'Collective', Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #80
I did. rug Sep 2014 #83
Apparently Not, Sir, Since You Ignored Its Meaning In Your Comments The Magistrate Sep 2014 #84
You have a habit of making wrong inferences. rug Sep 2014 #85
The Iraqi Government Meets Every Standard Of Legitimacy, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #87
The nation has a seat, run by this sham. rug Sep 2014 #88
None Of That, Sir, Affects The Fact That It Is Recognized As The Legitimate Government, By The World The Magistrate Sep 2014 #92
No, the point at issue is whether Russia has a point about going to the UN. rug Sep 2014 #108
And It Does Not Have A Legitimate Point Of Complaint, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #109
Saying it doesn't doesn't make it so. rug Sep 2014 #110
That, Sir, Is Advice You Might Want To Take Yourself.... The Magistrate Sep 2014 #112
Oh, do go on. rug Sep 2014 #113
Please Sir 4Q2u2 Sep 2014 #106
You apparently don't know the definition of "unilateral." tabasco Sep 2014 #55
Lol, no, I didn't forget Poland. rug Sep 2014 #62
You are Right sir...only the US is "Exceptional"..sir Billy Budd Sep 2014 #54
The Fact That You Neither Know Nor Understand The Rules, Sir, Does Not Mean Someone Else Breaks Them The Magistrate Sep 2014 #59
is that the US excuse sir Billy Budd Sep 2014 #81
This is from a guy who invaded another country and took a part of its land? Iliyah Sep 2014 #2
As the "Leader of the free world" we set the standards. newthinking Sep 2014 #3
They are beheading people dvduval Sep 2014 #22
He has no room to talk. However air strikes against Islamist militants in Syria without Autumn Sep 2014 #4
I suspect Syria will give us permission....just not publicly. PragmaticLiberal Sep 2014 #19
That is the crux of it. I suspect that many, many back-channel negotiations are underway LanternWaste Sep 2014 #27
+1, n/t RKP5637 Sep 2014 #56
I suspect you are right karynnj Sep 2014 #111
Problematic DustyJoe Sep 2014 #5
Well goodness, I guess Beloved Pootie Poot should have encouraged Assad to TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #6
Because most people don't care about others until it hits close to home. Iliyah Sep 2014 #10
Actually, it's suspected that Assad and ISIS had a tacit understanding to leave each TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #12
Syria struck ISIS when they were still in Iraq KurtNYC Sep 2014 #25
Syria has not seriously fought ISIS. A token airstrike to fend off US involvement TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #39
Obviously NOTHING Assad does will "fend off US involvement" since that involvement is ongoing KurtNYC Sep 2014 #44
You seem completely confused. ISIS may have originated years ago from TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #49
It misses the forest for a couple of trees. Igel Sep 2014 #57
Well, I don't know that we forgot, so much as thought/hoped/wished that somehow TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #70
ISIS controls only the thin black bands within Syria as shown here KurtNYC Sep 2014 #60
I'm sorry, I'm trying to understand what you're saying. Are you saying that TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #73
Seeing that map makes me think, given Obama's decision to deal with ISIS davidpdx Sep 2014 #101
ISIS 4Q2u2 Sep 2014 #105
And no Syrian strikes on ISIS in Syria until last month. I wonder why. pampango Sep 2014 #46
HAHAHAHAHAHA!! B2G Sep 2014 #7
Puty pooo poop sounds like the Republicans in the US riversedge Sep 2014 #8
Personally, I think he SHOULD go to the UN B2G Sep 2014 #9
Agree on both points. riversedge Sep 2014 #36
The US can do whatever the fuck it wants, because we're the good guys. Hugabear Sep 2014 #14
We pick and choose who we fight. DocMac Sep 2014 #23
That ship has sailed... Psephos Sep 2014 #28
Danny Devito said it better in Matilda jamzrockz Sep 2014 #29
I believe this is what you call a "pot to kettle" remark. Xolodno Sep 2014 #18
That would be wonderful. I hope Russia does. Iliyah Sep 2014 #21
Oh, me too............. ballyhoo Sep 2014 #50
Well, you might have some sort of point there, if Putin didn't actually take Crimea for Russia. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #40
quit making sense qazplm Sep 2014 #64
+ 1000. BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #102
That may well happen. And if there is a mistaken ballyhoo Sep 2014 #47
Adding Hopes For The Death Of American Service Members, Sir, To Your Usual? The Magistrate Sep 2014 #53
Obama said last August that he would use air strikes against Assad KurtNYC Sep 2014 #26
Yes, and as a result he got Syria to surrender all of its chemical weapons. nt geek tragedy Sep 2014 #43
That fact it comes from the land of Putin the liar who does whatever he pleases makes - CentralMass Sep 2014 #30
Which U.N. vote permitted Russia to invade Ukraine? Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #31
If there was a vote in the Security Council on bombing Syria Russia would just veto it. Louisiana1976 Sep 2014 #33
and shooting down a passenger airline is ....? n/t FloriTexan Sep 2014 #34
UN vote?... KansDem Sep 2014 #35
PLEASE,... PUT YOUR THINKING HATS ON! dawn frenzy adams Sep 2014 #37
"...After all, there are Russian citizens there...." ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #41
Excuse me? dawn frenzy adams Sep 2014 #67
You're excused. ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #72
Ethnic Russians... BadtotheboneBob Sep 2014 #75
Which action clearly violates the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, to which Russia is a signatory. n/t ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #77
LMAO. Putin's the one guy on the planet who cares less about international law than Cheney nt geek tragedy Sep 2014 #42
Do the Russian thing. Igel Sep 2014 #58
Well... dawn frenzy adams Sep 2014 #66
That, Ma'am, Is Incredibly Silly: It Is A Proper And Compact Usage The Magistrate Sep 2014 #69
Good catch . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #89
"Bomb. Send in troops. Tanks. APCs." another_liberal Sep 2014 #90
He is right, and a hypocrite, too. And Syria as said the same thing. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2014 #82
Germany and UK will not join attacks on IS targets in Syria. another_liberal Sep 2014 #86
ISIS kills two spies, and Obama claims its a reason to go to war quadrature Sep 2014 #91
You Consider Those To Be Legitimate Executions Then, Sir? The Magistrate Sep 2014 #93
a much bigger issue, is that a war is starting, over the killing of 2 people quadrature Sep 2014 #95
I'm sure the thousands of Yazidis starved to death on Mt. Sinjar by IS would disagree NickB79 Sep 2014 #98
That Does Not Answer the Question, Sir: You Said Two Spies Were Killed The Magistrate Sep 2014 #103
answers ... quadrature Sep 2014 #104
In Other Words, Sir, Your Comment Was Simply Bean Breeze The Magistrate Sep 2014 #107
It should also be noted that both of the Americans had been IS prisoners for months . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #94
there could be 'internal political' reasons for IS ... quadrature Sep 2014 #96
They were vauable just as hostages too . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #97
excellent point.... nt quadrature Sep 2014 #99
Bad idea. We should send in an uninspected aid convoy instead. pampango Sep 2014 #100
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia Says Air Strikes I...»Reply #8