Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia Says Air Strikes In Syria Would Be Act Of Aggression Without U.N. Vote [View all]Igel
(37,516 posts)Bomb. Send in troops. Tanks. APCs.
Then, when confronted with evidence, deny it. And accuse Russia of ill-will and attempts to manipulate others to defend corrupt, immoral regimes that would commit genocide. Putin as chief Islamist and warmongerer. Doesn't need to be true. Just repeated often enough. Perhaps we can set up "America Today" to catapult the agitprop.
When confronted with very, very good evidence, say that we need an objective evaluation of the evidence that is unbiased, with Russia very biased. Then let it drop because nobody is disinterested or unbiased, so "objective" means "whatever I want." If it doesn't drop, suggest a working group to produce a time line subject to multilateral approval on the formation of a task force to nominate members of a committee to explore the establishment of an ad hoc committee to formulate the working principles of an investigatory body on the matter. The actual formation of said task force to nominate ... would be postponed until at least January of the next fiscal year.
And if Russia continues to object, say that it's being militaristic and a threat to world order, and the world must mobilize to destroy it before it destroys the "American World." Then deny that this is anything but the most sincerest of peace plans and claim that Russia is wilfully failing to see and appreciate American attempts to de-escalate the situation in Syria and Iraq.
Then bomb. Send in more troops. More tanks. And more APCs.