know this. How do you we guarantee that, especially given that at least half of the country has never been in a position to get such training?
Prior to the theft by the banks, the Presidentially-appointed Federal Reserve Chairman was asked (on youtube, it is) if all this bubbling was wise, should people be taking these ARMs and other instruments, because the value could drop.
He said he "could NOT" envision a scenario where real estate would drop across the country, and thus lent his imprimatur, and by association the Federal government's approval, of the theft. Followed by Timothy McVeigh, I mean Geithner (I get my killers mixed up) who wrote in his book that he needed to keep the banks healthy on the backs of and by screwing over working by denying them opportunity so as to keep the nation going. Else we would regret the alternative.
I regret that ass clown ever sat in a chair we paid for.
Here's alink to his book lest you wonder that someone would write such drivel. Here is another with an audience full of voters on Jon Stewart laughing in his face.
So if not the government, whom, exactly, is promoting these thrifty ideas of not using ARMS and other instruments that benefit bankers and other lowlife creeps to the person who wants a place to live? Even if they have less income and education than the super smart person up on their white horse telling people how they should be making smart decisions - perhaps they should ride that fucking horse into their employer and insist that they pay the employee decently so they can fucking AFFORD the higher payment of a 15 or 30 years term. And while playing Roy Rogers could ride over the school and ask them to educate and train the kids in a way that doesn't primarily serve the interests of the employers and bankers.
But then where would these political parties get the huge donations they get from the bankers?
Your suggestion is smart, but there are a lot of people around trying to make sure it doesn't work the way you suggest.
= new reply since forum marked as read