Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia Says Air Strikes In Syria Would Be Act Of Aggression Without U.N. Vote [View all]quadrature
(2,049 posts)91. ISIS kills two spies, and Obama claims its a reason to go to war
your tax dollars at work.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Russia Says Air Strikes In Syria Would Be Act Of Aggression Without U.N. Vote [View all]
Purveyor
Sep 2014
OP
What is meant by "legal basis"? You mean AUMF, or UN/international, or what?
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#38
They could get a vote, Russia and China would object, and we'd do it anyway.
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#48
And You May Feel Free To Cite Something Establishing It Is Not Legal, Sir
The Magistrate
Sep 2014
#74
None Of That, Sir, Affects The Fact That It Is Recognized As The Legitimate Government, By The World
The Magistrate
Sep 2014
#92
The Fact That You Neither Know Nor Understand The Rules, Sir, Does Not Mean Someone Else Breaks Them
The Magistrate
Sep 2014
#59
He has no room to talk. However air strikes against Islamist militants in Syria without
Autumn
Sep 2014
#4
That is the crux of it. I suspect that many, many back-channel negotiations are underway
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#27
Well goodness, I guess Beloved Pootie Poot should have encouraged Assad to
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#6
Actually, it's suspected that Assad and ISIS had a tacit understanding to leave each
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#12
Syria has not seriously fought ISIS. A token airstrike to fend off US involvement
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#39
Obviously NOTHING Assad does will "fend off US involvement" since that involvement is ongoing
KurtNYC
Sep 2014
#44
Well, I don't know that we forgot, so much as thought/hoped/wished that somehow
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#70
I'm sorry, I'm trying to understand what you're saying. Are you saying that
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#73
Well, you might have some sort of point there, if Putin didn't actually take Crimea for Russia.
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#40
Adding Hopes For The Death Of American Service Members, Sir, To Your Usual?
The Magistrate
Sep 2014
#53
Yes, and as a result he got Syria to surrender all of its chemical weapons. nt
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#43
That fact it comes from the land of Putin the liar who does whatever he pleases makes -
CentralMass
Sep 2014
#30
If there was a vote in the Security Council on bombing Syria Russia would just veto it.
Louisiana1976
Sep 2014
#33
Which action clearly violates the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, to which Russia is a signatory. n/t
ColesCountyDem
Sep 2014
#77
LMAO. Putin's the one guy on the planet who cares less about international law than Cheney nt
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#42
a much bigger issue, is that a war is starting, over the killing of 2 people
quadrature
Sep 2014
#95
I'm sure the thousands of Yazidis starved to death on Mt. Sinjar by IS would disagree
NickB79
Sep 2014
#98
It should also be noted that both of the Americans had been IS prisoners for months . . .
another_liberal
Sep 2014
#94