MH17 crash: Dutch experts say numerous objects hit plane

[karynnj]

87. It is NOT editorializing to report what the report says AND to add that it is consistent with

something previously said. There are any number of experts who have said that the description is consistent with the damage you would expect from a SAM. As to the theories debunked, it would include any that would not result in that damage pattern- like the idea that the plane was shot at by another plane.

As to the article NOT addressing every Russian conspiracy theory, why would they? For instance, the fact that the international air traffic authorities continued to fly over that area was NOT in the report. It is not even in dispute. That will, of course, be part of what is in a final report where all the blame will be given.

As to reports - that seem mostly based in CT - that the Ukrainians were shadowing the plane or that there were things things said by the pilots, there has been no credible source of that. They do have a lot on what the air traffic controls, both Ukrainian and Russian, said when they lost sight of the plane.

Look, while it is NOT what YOU would report, it is valid reporting - far more than reporting things that some dude wrote on the internet.