Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Greybnk48

(10,713 posts)
4. But the contamination is NOT from fracking?
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 04:53 PM
Sep 2014

I call bullshit! Why was there virtually NO contamination before fracking began in these areas? Is this a matter of semantics? I'm confused by this story.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Duh Omaha Steve Sep 2014 #1
But what will be done about it? Nothing. Big Oil and Gas have Big Money LiberalEsto Sep 2014 #2
SU-prise, SU-prise! Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #3
But the contamination is NOT from fracking? Greybnk48 Sep 2014 #4
Those fraking gass-holes. nt TeamPooka Sep 2014 #5
No more fracking! mountain grammy Sep 2014 #6
This is a surprise to anyone? louis-t Sep 2014 #7
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #8
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gas wells linked to water...»Reply #4