Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Scottish independence: Voting under way in referendum [View all]candelista
(1,986 posts)38. Right. I suppose they will have a Governor General, like Canada & Oz.
This official, appointed by the Queen for each Commonwealth country, has more than ceremonial power. The one in Australia actually nullified an election because the crown didn't approve of the winner.
The Whitlam Government implemented a large number of new programs and policy changes, including the elimination of military conscription and criminal execution, institution of universal health care and fee-free university education, and the implementation of legal aid programs. With the Opposition-controlled Senate delaying passage of laws, Whitlam called a double-dissolution election in 1974 which he went on to win, albeit with a slightly reduced majority. However, the Opposition continued to control the Senate, and after becoming emboldened by government scandals and a flagging economy, began to challenge Whitlam again. In late 1975, the Senate prevented the progress of appropriation bills, thus denying the Government supply. Whitlam refused to back down, arguing that his elected Government was being held to ransom by the Senate. The crisis ended on 11 November, when Governor-General Sir John Kerr controversially dismissed Whitlam and commissioned Opposition Leader Malcolm Fraser as caretaker Prime Minister.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gough_Whitlam
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been thinking that even a squeaker "no" victory is a defeat for Cameron and the
politicat
Sep 2014
#49
Voting against separating is not necessarily an indication of not wanting freedom.
merrily
Sep 2014
#43
First results around 9pm Eastern; overall result unlikely before midnight eastern
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2014
#12
Thanks for your response on the other thread (or this one?) about the debt. But how does
freshwest
Sep 2014
#62
Mary Queen of Scots was executed by QE1, but she had been in a plot to overthrow her
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2014
#68
Thanks. Still find it odd that anyone wants royalty? What special powers do they have that make them
freshwest
Sep 2014
#73
Probably we saw it in the same way because we're both Brits and thus interested in this referendum
LeftishBrit
Sep 2014
#51
Why do the 'Queen's realms' want her? They have PMs as the executor of laws passed by Parliament.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#63
Ah, so your media is like ours, a tool first of the right and second of the establishment,
merrily
Sep 2014
#56
Brown: much better man than Blair, much worse politician (perhaps those go hand-in-hand?)
Spider Jerusalem
Sep 2014
#76
His successor as Tory leader would be a placeholder (probably Osborne at this point, maybe Hague)
Spider Jerusalem
Sep 2014
#75
but, but, but..... what about Balmoral? will it just become a tourist attraction *sarcasm*
secondwind
Sep 2014
#28
Actually, the Queen owns Balmoral outright. It's not like some of the other royal residences
amandabeech
Sep 2014
#50
One wonders how many millions of pounds the No side has thrown into their campaign
KamaAina
Sep 2014
#60
So you're cool with Burger King buying Tim Horton's and moving its HQ to Canada?
KamaAina
Sep 2014
#72