Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 72% Believe U.S. Will Use American Combat Troops Against ISIS [View all]TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)34. No, it's not that simple. The distinction Obama is making is whether our troops will
PRIMARILY be doing the patrols, the raids, the shooting, the holding of ground--or having advisors and special forces and combat controllers embedded to assist the Iraqis and Kurds to do the patrols, the raids, the shooting, and the holding of ground. There are, and always will, be "boots on the ground", in any military operation--special forces, advance teams, intel, support. That's quite a different war than entire infantry brigades. I don't know why people are upset or hung up over Obama's plans, I think his strategy so far is the best of many bad options.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unable to gin up enough fear to start an actual war, the mass media resorts to their own custom
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#18
Yes, we're caught up in the enemy of my enemy is a friend except those who are still
libdem4life
Sep 2014
#36
That's a different issue. It is quite possible to be skeptical about Obama's promise not
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#23
Expecting the worst (OP) and wanting the worst (your post) are two different things. nt
valerief
Sep 2014
#25
those war profiteers who make huge profits off ground troop support, need to BUG OFF to ME countries
Sunlei
Sep 2014
#5
Fighting troops are not necessary, if they are let the folks in the area do it. How come no question
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#19
The question is who besides Americans can stand up to ISIS rather than throwing down
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#21
I believe there's actually a huge discussion of who could fight on the ground.
cheapdate
Sep 2014
#22
and 61% of the Americans believe there should be daily prayer in public schools
still_one
Sep 2014
#17
Yes many Americans support prayer in schools. But the point here is that a majority of Americans do
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#20
The public are wrong about public prayer in schools, and about most every other thing since they
still_one
Sep 2014
#24
The public is getting a lot of things right too. Every poll I have seen now shows majority
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#26
yeah, that is why they voted bush two terms. They are not right most of the time
still_one
Sep 2014
#28
It's not a matter of not believing him. It's a recognition that the situation may turn into
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#30
No, it's not that simple. The distinction Obama is making is whether our troops will
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#34
That's because there's a relentless drumbeat in the media that we'll just never
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#29
And 99% of Americans believe the US Govt. will do whatever the other 1% tells them to do.
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#31