Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Governor (Jerry Brown) vetoes bill that would have limited police use of drones [View all]davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)21. I'm confused...
Perhaps someone who understands this a bit better can enlighten me...
Basically what this means is that there is no need for a warrant to use surveillance drones... in other words, they can spy on the public at will, for whatever reason they please, or for no reason at all?
Also, just how silent are these drones? How close to a home do they have to be to do any actual spying? The idea of one sitting outside my house is kind of laughable. Of course, in my neck of the woods, there are so many rednecks with guns that they'd probably shoot the damn things down - if they could see them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Governor (Jerry Brown) vetoes bill that would have limited police use of drones [View all]
Newsjock
Sep 2014
OP
Pat Brown defeated Richard Nixon in 1959 and was defeated by Ronald Reagan in 1967,
ucrdem
Sep 2014
#20
"Drones are another step in enhancing the police state" Sounds alot like the same
cstanleytech
Sep 2014
#9
I live in an area of Los Angeles that is rendered almost unlivable at times due to the helicopters/
JDPriestly
Sep 2014
#12
Helicopters are only allowed to fly within a certain distance over your house. I don't think that
JDPriestly
Sep 2014
#41
They shouldn't have them to begin with. I am not satisfied with limitations on them in the U.S.
EEO
Sep 2014
#3
+1. But the Police State marches on, with the full cooperation of "Democrats."
blkmusclmachine
Sep 2014
#16
Oh the drones have alot of potential real benefits both in utility and in monetary savings.
cstanleytech
Oct 2014
#51